A Study on
Impact of Organized Retailing on Consumers
Sanjay Mishra
Associate Prof. and HOD, Shri Shankaracharya Engineering College, Bhilai
*Corresponding Author
E-mail: mail2sanjaymishra@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Purpose: The purpose of the survey of consumers is to
understand the behaviour of and benefits to consumers
in shopping at organized vs. unorganized retail outlets.
Design/ Methodology/Approach: Exit interviews were
conducted with 75 consumers who shopped at 10 organized outlets in the cities
of Raipur and Bhilai and an equal number of consumers
who shopped at 10 unorganized outlets in the same cities. After dropping the
outliers, the sample has 72 customers at organized outlets and 73 at
unorganized outlets. Stratified systematic sampling design with a sample size
of 150 was used for the study. Multivariate statistical techniques were used to
analyze the data collected with the help of a structured questionnaire.
Findings: Consumers have definitely gained from organized
retail on multiple counts.
• Overall consumer spending has increased with the entry
of the organized retail.
• While all income groups saved through organized retail
purchases, the survey revealed that lower income consumers saved more. Thus,
organized retail is relatively more beneficial to the less well-off consumers.
• Proximity is a major comparative advantage of
unorganized outlets.
• Unorganized retailers have significant competitive
strengths that include consumer goodwill, credit sales, amenability to
bargaining, ability to sell loose items, convenient timings, and home delivery.
Research limitation: This study was carried out in
Chhattisgarh in the towns of Raipur and Bhilai and,
therefore, the results obtained may not be generalized to the country as a
whole. The small sample size of 150 may also generate error-prone results.
Factor analysis with such a small sample would have questionable applicability.
Practical implication: The outcomes of the study are
sufficient to indicate towards the importance of low income groups and the
savings they manage by the route of targeted shopping against as expected that
it is the upper middle and upper class that benefit maximum from shopping at
organized retail outlets.
Originality/ Value:
The study would help the organized retailers to develop programs
suitable to cater to the focused group along with optimizing the sales period
spread.
KEYWORDS: Consumers, Retail, Organized, Impact, Customer spending
Today,
India is the world’s second-fastest growing major economy. Several global
studies predict that India will fare better than most of her counterparts in
the developing world in terms of robust economic growth.
India is
experiencing a surge of economic growth, and with this comes an increased
vibrancy and buoyancy in her desire to become a pre-eminent player in the
global arena.
Some of
India’s major economic sectors include agriculture, automotive, manufacturing,
pharmaceutical and services-based exports.
The real GDP of India
is expected to grow at 8-10 per cent per annum and as a result, the consuming
class with annual household incomes above Rs. 90,000 is expected to rise from
about 370 million in 2006-07 to 620 million in 2011-12.
An important aspect of
the current economic scenario in India is the emergence of organized retail.
Often described as a “sunrise sector,” the Indian retail sector comprises 13
percent of GDP and employs 6 percent of the nation’s workforce. There has been
considerable growth in organized retailing business in recent years and it is
poised for much faster growth in the future. It is estimated to grow at 13 per
cent annually from US$ 322 billion in 2006-07 to US$ 590 billion in 2011-12.
The
retail sector, in addition to rapidly evolving, is becoming increasingly
complex to operate within. Shifting demographics, globally exposed and educated
consumers, new channel formats and changes in consumption patterns require that
sector participants quickly adjust and modify to meet the needs of demanding
current (and future) consumers.
While
the Indian retail sector is still waiting to be granted industry status, many
of India’s leading retailers recognize that it is becoming increasingly
important to serve customers, provide them with an optimal price-quality
relationship, add value to the shopping experience and foster customer loyalty.
Major industrial
houses have entered this area and have announced very ambitious future
expansion plans. Transnational corporations are also seeking to India and set
up retail chains in collaboration with big Indian companies. However, opinions
are divided on the impact of the growth of organized retail in the country.
Concerns have been raised that the growth of organized retailing may have an
adverse impact on retailers in the unorganized sector. It has also been argued
that growth of organized retailing will yield efficiencies in the supply chain,
enabling better access to markets to producers (including farmers and small
producers) and enabling higher prices, on the one hand and, lower prices to consumers,
on the other. In the context of divergent views on the impact of organized
retail, it is essential that an in-depth analytical study on the possible
effects of organized retailing should be undertaken at all levels (local as
well as national).
Because of the growing
importance, impact and the kind of investment involved, it becomes imperative
for the organized retail to develop understanding on the reasons why will a
particular segment shop with them, who will shop for what benefit with them
which in turn would help them maximize benefits from the operations.
Literature Review:
Various statistics and forecasts have been
indicating the increase in disposable income, favorable development of spending
habits and population that is responsible for the growth of organized retail in
the country. (Kawal Gill; The Retail Digest; 2010
“Dynamics of Indian Organized Retail”).
In the Indian retail arena, interesting times
lie ahead (Devashish Das Gupta; Retailing in India
and the Role of the Marketing Mix: European Retail Digest of August 2010). The world’s largest middle class
is waking up to the retail revolution. It will take more time to reach optimal
penetration, but it has already become tough for retailers to operate with low
margins and high costs. Proper marketing strategies hold the key. Gone are the
days of fixed pricing strategies like everyday low pricing (EDLP), loss leader
strategies and perceived value pricing are making the life of retailers more
and more difficult by the day.
A definite shift has been observed in the
consumer behaviour towards organized retailers in
particular in kirana purchase. The major reasons for
this changing behaviour are location, helpful,
trustworthy salespeople, home shopping, cleanliness, offers, quality and
negatively related to travel convenience. (Paromita Goswami and Mridula S. Mishra; Would Indian consumers move from kirana stores to organized retailers when shopping for
groceries? : Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics Vol. 21 No. 1,
2009).
Tighter supply chains can be related to
betterment in retailer’s performance in select categories. (Suman
Basuroy, Murali K. Mantrala, and Rockney G. Walters; “The Impact of Category Management on
Retailer Prices and Performance: Theory and Evidence”; Journal of Marketing
Vol. 65, October 2001). This factor may result in improving margins for the
retailers who may pass on a percentage of the savings hence made to the
customer or else may utilize the same in improving facilities. Here the
organized retailers have an upper hand.
The position of a brand in a vertical or
horizontal retail display also influences quality expectations and, thus,
choices (Raghubir and Valenzuela 2008). Hence limited
display in kirana store may be a factor of concern.
There is growing trend of using the point of purchase as an advertising medium
aimed at building brand awareness and image over the long run and not just as a
distribution channel (Egol and Vollmer 2008).
All the above researches hint towards need of
fresh look to develop further understanding in particular in our region i.e.
Chhattisgarh so that both unorganized and organized retailers may target
suitable customers with inventory of suitable merchandise in order to enhance
customer service along with improving operating margins.
Research Methodology:
Questionnaire-based
exit survey was conducted on consumers’ shopping at organized retail outlets
and also consumers’ shopping at unorganized outlets.
Area Surveyed: - Raipur and Bhilai
(Chhattisgarh), India.
Research Method: -Survey method, Structured Interview through
Questionnaire.
Sample size: - 150
Sample Composition:
Consumers: |
Strata |
Sample Size |
|
Students |
15 |
|
New Job Holder (Male) |
10 |
|
New Job Holder (Female) |
10 |
|
Working People (Male) |
30 |
|
Working People (Female) |
30 |
|
Home maker |
30 |
|
Old/Retired Persons |
25 |
|
Total: |
150 |
·
Type of
sampling: Simple
Random Sampling and Stratified Random Sampling Method.
·
Source of Primary Data: - Visiting
the organization (With
Questionnaire.), Using structured questionnaire for the customer
leaving the store after purchase.
·
Design of
the Questionnaire: - It
carries a set of multiple type questions which are easily answered by the
customers in a short period of time.
·
Methods
Used for Analysis: Bar Chart
is the tools that has been used in analyzing the data.
Findings
and Analysis:
Similar to the whole
country, organized retail has come up in the retail business in Raipur and Bhilai. Even though all the organized retail outlets are in
the entry level still, but within a less time it became successful. The
comparison analysis between these two types of retailing in readymade garments
is done by focusing on few factors.
These are:
1. Income Levels of Shoppers
2. Location Advantage for the Unorganized
Retailers
3. Mode of Conveyance
4. Preference for Organized vs. Unorganized
Retailers
5. Savings from Organized Outlets
6. Consumers’ View on Opening of More Organized
Outlets
All these are
discussed below:
1. Income Levels of Shoppers
As per the
expectation, consumers shopping at organized outlets generally had higher
income levels than consumers shopping at unorganized outlets. The middle class
(monthly household income range between Rs.10, 000 to Rs. 1, 00,000) which is
the mainstay for retail, shop at both organized and unorganized outlets.
Table 1:
Average Monthly Household Income of Shoppers (%Share)
Income Groups in (Rs.) Per Month |
At Organized Retail Outlets |
At Unorganized Retail Outlets |
Up to 10000 |
8 |
24 |
10001 – 20000 |
25 |
30 |
20001 – 50000 |
30 |
16 |
50001 – 100000 |
7 |
4 |
100001 – above |
2 |
1 |
Income Groups in (Rs.)
Per Month
Series 1 |
At
Organized Retail Outlets |
Series 2 |
At
unorganized Retail Outlets |
2. Location Advantage for the
Unorganized Retailers
Unorganized retailers
enjoyed location as a comparative advantage as the mean distance to the
residence for consumers at unorganized outlets is <1.0 km as compared to
compared to 2.1 km for consumers at organized outlets.
Table 2
Distance Travelled |
At Organized Retail Outlets |
At Unorganized Retail Outlets |
.5 KM |
19 |
45 |
.6 - 1 KM |
17 |
18 |
1 - 2 KM |
12 |
5 |
2 - 4 KM |
11 |
3 |
4 KM and above |
14 |
2 |
Distance Travelled
Series 1 |
At
Organized Retail Outlets |
Series 2 |
At
unorganized Retail Outlets |
3. Mode of Conveyance
As
expected, majority of consumers walk to unorganized outlets, while most of the
consumers use own vehicles to reach organized outlets confirming to the average
distance travelled being low for the unorganized retailers apart from the general
income level of shoppers being higher for the shoppers of organized retailers.
Car and two wheelers score high and equal as against two wheelers clearly
outnumbering the cars for unorganized outlets.
Table 3
Mode of Transport |
At Organized Retail Outlets |
At Unorganized Retail Outlets |
Walk |
9 |
40 |
Car |
24 |
3 |
Two Wheeler |
24 |
17 |
Other |
16 |
13 |
Mode of Transport
Series 1 |
At
Organized Retail Outlets |
Series 2 |
At
unorganized Retail Outlets |
4. Preference for Organized
vs. Unorganized Retailers
Shoppers at organized
outlets mainly shop for the reasons like better product quality, decent price,
one-stop shopping hence saving time, availability of more products and brands,
shopping pleasure, fast turnover of the stocks, etc. on the other hand shoppers
at unorganized outlets ascribed that proximity to residence, relations and
goodwill, credit availability, possibility of bargaining, choice of loose
items, convenient timings, home delivery, etc.
Study also revealed
that no shopper shopped exclusively at either of outlets. They shop at both
outlets and the share of spending varies from product to product as shown in
Table 4. On the whole, the sample shoppers at organized outlets make a 33 per
cent of their spending on food and grocery, and textiles and clothing at
unorganized outlets.
Similarly, consumers
interviewed at unorganized outlets also spend at organized outlets; on an
average, 36 per cent of their monthly shopping is done at organized outlets.
This is relatively higher for toiletries (59 per cent), household cleaning
products (45 per cent), readymade garments (45 per cent), and cooking oil (41
percent).
On being asked about
the change in spending after start of shopping from organized outlets, around
50 per cent of sampled consumers recalled increase in spending, 17 per cent
indicated a decrease and the rest reported no change. Hence helping conclusion
that shopping at organized retail generally increased spending mostly
unintended.
The reasons indicated
for higher spending have been mainly the purchase of larger quantities due to
wider range of products, availability of attractive offers like discounts and
promotional schemes, and access to better quality products with higher prices.
Table 4
Share of Average Monthly Spending by Product Category of Consumers at
Organized/ Unorganized Outlets (% Share)
Consumers at Organized Outlets |
Consumers at Unorganized Outlets |
|||
Spending
at Organized Outlets |
Spending at Unorganized Outlets |
Spending at Organized Outlets |
Spending at Unorganized Outlets |
|
|
5. Savings from Organized
Outlets:
Savings in
purchase from organized retail outlets was expected as one of the major reasons
for the customer shift from unorganized to organized retail outlets. Purchasers
going for high value buying were expected to gain more; similarly consumers
with high household income who are more frequent visitors to the organized
outlets were expected to save more due to higher experience in the modern
formats. True, savings are there. But the degree of saving depended on the type
of modern formats. An overall saving of 4 percent was found for the shoppers of
organized retail outlets. The saving is higher at 8 per cent at discount stores
and supermarkets, and a low of 2 per cent at hypermarkets and hardly one per
cent at departmental stores (textiles and clothing outlets). Contrary to the
popular belief, the findings show that small spenders have saved more from
shopping at organized outlets (Table 5).
To understand this we
may assume two possibilities: a) Targeted buying by the individuals for special
discounts and offers and b) the sampled consumers with smaller household
incomes being more savings conscious and
planned rather than being leisurely and pleasure shoppers purchased more
from the formats like discount stores and hence made more savings. Table 6
clearly shows that it is really the low-income households who save more at
organized outlets and the savings percent dramatically reduces with increase in
household/ disposable incomes.
6. Consumers’ View on Opening
of More Organized Outlets
Regarding the
consumers opinion towards opening of more organized outlets in the region of
study, 63 per cent of the shoppers at organized outlets, as against only 47 per
cent of shoppers at unorganized outlets preferred to have more organized
outlets. Among both shoppers, around 25% did respond against more organized
outlets.
Table 5
Savings from Buying at Organized Outlets by
Format (as % of Spending) |
|||||
Spending at Sampled Visit (Rupees) |
Discount Store |
Supermarket |
Hypermarket |
Departmental Store |
Overall |
Up to 250 |
12 |
10 |
6 |
0 |
10 |
251-500 |
9 |
6 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
501-1000 |
7 |
9 |
6 |
4 |
7 |
1001-2000 |
7 |
10 |
3 |
2 |
6 |
2001-5000 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
5000 and above |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0.4 |
Overall |
8 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
Table 6
Savings from Buying at Organized Outlets by
Format (as % of Spending) |
|||||
Monthly Household Income |
Discount Store |
Supermarket |
Hypermarket |
Departmental Store |
Overall |
Up to 10000 |
17 |
10 |
6 |
0 |
10 |
10001-20000 |
7 |
10 |
4 |
4 |
7 |
20001- 50000 |
7 |
6 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
50001-100000 |
7 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
100001 and above |
0 |
7 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
Overall |
8 |
8 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
Table 7
Attitude towards Opening of More Organized
Outlets |
||
|
Organized Outlets |
Unorganized Outlets |
Yes |
47 |
35 |
No |
18 |
16 |
no opinion |
7 |
22 |
Findings of the Study
• Consumers have
definitely gained from organized retail on multiple counts.
• Overall consumer
spending has increased with the entry of the organized retail
• While all income
groups saved through organized retail purchases, the survey revealed that lower
income consumers saved more. Thus, organized retail is relatively more
beneficial to the less well-off consumers.
• Proximity is a major
comparative advantage of unorganized outlets.
• Unorganized
retailers have significant competitive strengths that include consumer
goodwill, credit sales, amenability to bargaining, ability to sell loose items,
convenient timings, and home delivery.
CONCLUSION:
The study very clearly
establishes that the customers are very
open in their choices and hop around depending upon their requirements. This
indicates that as far as the selling preposition at the retail outlets is
concerned, it is examined critically by the customers and depending upon the
objective of buying the customers choose organized or unorganized retail
destination. The retail revolution is at very nascent stage in the region and
sufficient space is available for all the formats of organized retailing as
well as unorganized retailing. Yes, unorganized retailing should capitalize on
the areas of advantage and at the same time have plans for adopting the
features of organized retailing so as to serve the customers aspirations
better.
REFERENCES:
1. Kawal Gill; The Retail Digest; 2010 “Dynamics of
Indian Organized Retail”
2. Devashish Das Gupta; Retailing in India and the Role of the
Marketing Mix: European Retail Digest of August 2010
3. Paromita Goswami and Mridula S. Mishra; Would Indian
consumers move from kirana stores to organized
retailers when shopping for groceries?
4. CRISIL
Research-Retailing Annual Review 2009
5. Indian
Council For Research On International Economic Relations Report 2008
6. Goswami P., Mishra M.S. (2009)
(to be published), ‘Would Indian Consumers move from Kirana
Stores to Organized Retailers when Shopping for Groceries?’, Asia-Pacific
Journal of Marketing and Logistics, abstract may be viewed at http://papers.ssrn.com/
1abstract=983303, last accessed on May 15, 2008
7. Kakkar S. (2008) , ‘The Future of Kirana
Stores and Implications for National Brands’, 9th Marketing and Retail
Conclave, Organized by Technopak, February 19-21, The
Taj Palace, New Delhi, India
8. Tata
Strategic Management Group-Organised Retailing in
India: The next growth frontier, 2006
9. Suman Basuroy, Murali K. Mantrala, and Rockney G. Walters;
“The Impact of Category Management on Retailer Prices and Performance: Theory
and Evidence”; Journal of Marketing Vol. 65, October 2001
Received on 04.08.2012 Accepted on 23.08.2012
©A&V Publications all right reserved
Asian J.
Management 3(3): July-Sept., 2012 page 169-173