Role
of Media in Corporate Governance
Mrs. Rincey B. Abraham
Research Scholar, Asst. Professor (Commerce), St. Thomas
College, Ruabandha Sector, Bhilai
*Corresponding Author E-mail: rinceythomas23@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
In
this paper we study the effect of media coverage on corporate governance by
focusing on India. We discuss the role of the media in pressuring corporate
managers and directors to behave in ways that are socially acceptable.
Sometimes this coincides with shareholders’ value maximization, others not. We
provide both anecdotal and systematic evidence that media affect companies’
policy toward the environment and the amount of corporate resources that are
diverted to the sole advantage of controlling shareholders. Our results have
important consequences for the focus of the corporate governance debate and for
the feasibility of reforms aimed at improving corporate governance around the
world.
KEYWORDS: Corporate Governance, Media,
Shareholders
Corporate governance is the set of processes,
customs, policies, laws, and institutions affecting the way a corporation or
company is directed, administered or controlled. An important theme of corporate governance is
the nature and extent of accountability of particular individuals in the
organization, and mechanisms that try to reduce or eliminate the
principal-agent problem. Corporate governance also includes the relationships
among the many stakeholders involved and the goals for which the corporation is
governed. In contemporary business corporations, the main external stakeholder
groups are shareholders, debt holders, trade creditors, suppliers, customers
and communities affected by the corporation's activities. Internal stakeholders
are the board of directors, executives, and other employees.
Corporate Governance has emerged as a response to many of
corporate failures and widespread dissatisfaction about the functioning of the
corporate sector. They are powerful system by which corporate bodies are
directed and controlled. The Corporate Governance refers to relationship
between Owners, Directors and Managers. Board of Directors is the Centre of
Corporate Governance serves not only the company’s interest but also the
society at large.
Distribution of Rights And Responsibilities among different
participants-Board, Manager, Shareholders, Stakeholder It covers issues like-
The legal issues of investors, The system of Electing the Board of Directors,
The Composition of Board and its various Committees, System of Checks and
balances, Ethics, Maximization of Owners wealth by Managers, The ability of the
board to maintain Surveillance.
Corporate
governance mechanisms differ as between banks. The governance mechanism of each
bank is shaped by its political, economic and social history as also by its
legal framework. Despite the differences in shareholder philosophies across all
banks, good governance mechanisms need to be encouraged among all corporate and
non-corporate entities. Key elements of good corporate governance principles
include honesty, trust and integrity, openness, performance orientation,
responsibility and accountability, mutual respect, and commitment to the
organization.
Both
government and RBI need to bring about significant changes in the corporate
governance mechanism adopted by banks and other financial intermediaries. As a
matter of principle, RBI should not appoint its nominees on the boards of banks
to avoid conflict of interests. Although it is not feasible to have a free
market for take- over in respect banks there is a strong case for recognizing
the rights of the shareholders, especially of public sector banks and financial
institutions.
Today
the common shareholders are denied such basic rights as adopting annual
accounts or approving dividends. They cannot also influence composition of the
boards in any way. As a part of strengthening the functioning of their boards,
banks should appoint a risk management committee of the board in addition to the three other board
committees viz. audit, remuneration and appointment committees. Since banks and
institutions are highly leveraged entities their failure would pose large risks
to the entire economic system. Their corporate governance mechanisms should,
therefore, be relatively much tighter. Banks should have clear strategies for
guiding their operations and establishing accountability for executing them.
Banks also maintain high degree of transparency in regard to disclosure of
information of importance principles of corporate governance is how directors
and management develop a model of governance that aligns the values of the
corporate participants and then evaluate this model periodically for its effectiveness. In particular, senior
executives should conduct themselves honestly and ethically, especially
concerning actual or apparent conflicts of interest, and disclosure in
financial reports.
Defining terms
Corporate governance is about promoting corporate fairness,
transparency and accountability. Yet a precise definition of what is a
relatively new concept remains blurred. Some take a narrow view, seeing
“governance” as a fancy term for the way in which directors and auditors handle
their responsibilities towards shareholders. Others expand the concept to
explain a firm’s relationship to society, often blurring the distinction
between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility.
Definition from the OECD:
Corporate governance is the system by
which business corporations are directed and controlled. The corporate
governance structure specifies the distribution of rights and responsibilities
among different participants in the corporation, such as the board, managers,
shareholders and other stakeholders, and spells out the rules and procedures
for making decisions on corporate affairs. By doing this, it also provides the
structure through which the company objectives are set, and the means of
attaining those objectives and monitoring performance.
Why is corporate governance important?
Corporate governance refers to the way that Boards oversee the
running of a company by its managers, and how Board members are held
accountable to shareowners and the company. This has implications for company
behavior not only to shareowners but also to employees, customers, those
financing the company, and other stakeholders, including the communities in
which the business operates. Research shows that responsible management of
environmental, social and governance issues creates a business ethos and
environment that builds both a company’s integrity within society and the trust
of its shareowners.
Good corporate governance helps an organization achieve several
objectives and some of the more important ones include:
• Developing appropriate strategies that result in the achievement
of stakeholder objectives
• Attracting, motivating and retaining talent
• Creating a secure and prosperous operating environment and
improving operational performance
• Managing and mitigating risk and protecting and enhancing the
company’s reputation.
Some aspects covered in the poll include:
• Corporate governance regulations in India
• Corporate governance concerns in India and role of independent
directors and audit committees in addressing these concerns.
• Board practices, board oversight of risk management and the
importance given to integrity and ethical values
• Practices that is fundamental to improved corporate governance.
REVIEW
OF LITERATURE:
Dash Kumar Amarendra,
2012 “Media impact on corporate governance in India: a research agenda",
Corporate Governance, Vol. 12 Issn: 1, pp.89 – 100,
According to him the research on the impact of media on corporate governance is
basically done in the context of Western media and democracy. There is no
attempt to gauge the influence of media reports on corporate governance in
India, although the largest democracy of the world has experienced the biggest
scandals of unethical governance in the last two decades.
Agarwal. K. Anurag,
2012 “Corporate Governance: Confidentiality and Role of Media in Changing
Times” In this legal and ethical issues are raised, particularly in the recent
times when technology is changing at a rapid pace and also with stakes involved
becoming higher and higher. With a written Constitution in India guaranteeing
freedom of speech and expression to its citizens, including the media, it is a
real test for the judiciary to achieve the right balance. Journalists are often
protected by law not to disclose the identity of the confidential source, and
this right – reporter’s privilege – at times seriously hinders the course of
law. The paper examines these issues and discusses a couple of such cases.
Further, it studies the role of media in India in the fast changing scenario,
particularly in the light of the recent Supreme Court judgement
– in Sahara v. SEBI case (September 11, 2012) – mandating self-regulation. The
paper concludes that legal tools alone cannot bring the desired change and
concerted effort needs to be made by the media, government and businesses for
healthy and desirable dissemination of information.
OBJECTIVE:
Is to study the role of media in ensuring corporate governance in
the present world and to study the, what is the power of media in ensuring
media especially in India.
SCOPE
OF THE STUDY:
The
study deals with the role of media in ensuring corporate governance which is a
vast subject. So the scope of the study mainly focus on guidelines of various
areas like Media, Environment, Human Rights, Shareholders value, Case etc. What
will be its impact on corporate governance?
METHODOLOGY:
The
methodology adopted for this study is exploratory using the open-ended
approach. These open ended questions are posed to media persons and other
industry persons. The data collected by secondary data such as Articles,
Journals books, magazines, corporate governance text book and data collected
from official web sites.
Need For Corporate
Governance In India
Post
liberalization period (1993-1995) was a boom period, Capital through Public
issues, Many Fake companies came in,
which are now nowhere, Indian companies
getting Global thus more transparency
demanded by Foreign investors, Collaborators, buyers. Stories of Family owned
business, Improving Ethical climate, Shadow Directors, Accounting Juggleries,
Growing awareness towards Good Corporate Governance.
Corporate Advertising
Advertising in India is a big business, though small compared to
US and Europe. The main lacuna is that there is no agency or a regulator to
control advertising. Advertising is constantly bombarded by criticism. It is
accused of encouraging materialism and consumption, of stereotyping, of driving
us to purchase items for which we have no need, of taking advantage of
children, of manipulating our behavior and generally contributing to the
downfall of our social system.
If advertising employs different media and techniques, it itself
is of several different kinds. There are commercial advertising, public service
advertising and political advertising. Even assuming differences in advertising
methods what follows is widely applicable.
What Role Can the Media Play in Corporate Governance in India?
Media
role can be seen as key to creating awareness of Corporate Governance in
business houses. Communication between Media and Corporate bodies directly and
through efficient public relations or mass communications can be vital to
ensure good governance and human rights. Media must be on the front line in
disseminating impartial news for ensuring transparency in the corporate sector.
Media have a watchdog role to ensure accountability and transparency of
corporate sector. Media also need to improve their capacity to play the
watchdog role.
Role of Media in pressuring corporate managers
and directors to behave in ways that is socially acceptable. Sometimes this
coincides with Shareholder’s value maximization. Media affects company’s policy
toward the environment and the amount of corporate resources that are diverted
to the sole advantage of controlling shareholders. In recent years hedge funds have emerged as among the most
powerful players in corporate governance worldwide.
The role of the media is to collect, select, certify, and
repackage information. In doing so they dramatically reduce the cost economic
agents face to become informed. When the Wall Street Journal reports a
table with the quarterly performance of mutual funds, for instance, an investor
does not have to spend time dramatic reduction of the cost of collecting
information is very important since, in many situations, collecting all the
pieces of information herself, but she can glance at them in a second, for the
price of a dollar plus the opportunity cost of the time spent reading.
Furthermore, if there is a strong complementarily between news and
entertainment, as is often the case for hot or titillating topics, the media
can make the cost of absorbing information negative by packaging news
appropriately. This individual agent face a rational ignorance paradox: the
cost of becoming informed exceeds the benefit they can personally gain from
that information. Hence, the media have the power to overcome the “rational
ignorance” result. By doing so, the media increase the number of people who
learn about the behavior of other people, thereby increasing the effect of
reputation.
The media can play a role in corporate governance by affecting reputation
in at least three ways.
First, media attention can
drive politicians to introduce corporate law reforms or enforce corporate laws
in the belief that inaction would hurt their future political careers or shame
them in the eyes of public opinion, both at home and abroad.
Second, media attention could affect reputation through the
standard channel that most economic models emphasize. In the traditional
understanding of reputation managers’ wages in the future depend on
shareholders’ and future employers’ beliefs about whether the managers will
attend to their interests in those situations where they cannot be monitored.
This concern about a monetary penalty can lead mangers not to take advantage of
opportunities for self dealing so as to create a belief that they are good
managers.
Third, and what we emphasize here, media attention affects not
only managers’ and board members’ reputations in the eyes of shareholders and
future employers, but media attention affects their reputation in the eyes of society
at large.
Beneficial Effects of
Advertising
·
Information: Advertising aids in the
education of general public; facilitates the exercise of free choice and free
will and subsidies mass communication providing essential services to the
public.
·
Values and Life-Styles: Advertising contributes to the
improvement in the standard of living, contribution to the sharing of comforts
among the masses, and represents as essential factor in the economies of
abundance.
·
Creative Experience: Advertising adds new and
interesting experience to life.
Adverse Effects of Advertising
·
Deception: A deceptive advertisement is one
in which a material untruth is told or hinted at. The use of a secondary
meaning of a word is also considered as deceptive.
·
Fear Appeals: It has been criticized. The
intent of fear appeals is to create anxiety in the minds of the consumer and
provoke him/her to make use of a particular product to alleviate the fear in
him/her.
·
Increasing Costs: Advertisements that provide
information to consumers about the existence of certain products indirectly
increase the final cost of a product. The ultimate burden of the cost is passed
on to the consumer.
LIMITATIONS
OF THE STUDY:
1) The main limitation of this
study is that the media people will not provide any type the information.
2) Now a day’s every big company is coming with
their own channel, newspapers, or any other type of media. So they are not
ethical and won’t provide correct information.
FINDINGS:
1) Media are not ethical in collecting information.
2) Many of large companies coming up with their own media, which is
benefiting their own companies.
3) Companies are having more number of channels and news channels.
4) Companies are not that much ethical because they are not providing
proper information.
RECOMMENDATIONS/SUGGESTIONS:
1) A company does not have more no. of channels or news papers, which
supports to their own companies.
2) Government should take necessary steps to make the companies
follow ethically practices.
3) Government should take
necessary steps when giving permission to media.
CONCLUSION:
The
media can help shareholders or can hurt them. We conjecture that while the
strength of the impact of the media depends on their credibility, the direction
of their net effect depends on societal norms and values, but much more
research is needed before coming to any definite conclusion on this matter. The
only definite conclusion we can draw at this point is that the media are
important in shaping corporate policy and should not be ignored in any analysis
of a country’s corporate governance system. From a policy point of view our
contribution provides both good and bad news. The important role of the media
in affecting the functioning of government institutions, but the media plays an
equally important role in shaping corporate policy. Our contribution is a first
attempt to outline the theoretical channels through which this influence takes place
and to show their practical relevance. We argued that the media selectively
reduce the cost of acquiring and verifying information.
REFERENCES:
Agarwal. K. Anurag, 2012 “Corporate Governance: Confidentiality and
Role of Media in Changing Times
Dr. Bhatt Singh Alka, Social Reporting in Corporate Governance and the role
of Media in Corporate Governance.
Dash Kumar Amarendra, 2012 “Media impact on corporate governance in
India: a research agenda", Corporate Governance, Vol. 12 ISSN: 1, pp.89 –
100
Fernando.
A.C, Corporate governance
Klempner Geoffrey, Ethics and Advertising.
Picard.G.Robert, Corporate Governance of Media Companies.
The Corporate Governance
Role of the Media: Evidence from Russia.
Zingales Luigi
and Dyck Alexander, The Corporate Governance Role of
the Media.
Received on 20.01.2014 Modified on 29.01.2014
Accepted on 14.02.2014 © A&V Publication all right reserved
Asian J. Management 5(2):
April-June, 2014 page 155-158