Cooperative Marketing- Benefits &
Challenges
Dr. S.H. Honnalli
Doddappa Appa Institute of MBA, Gulbarga – 585 103
*Corresponding Author E-mail: shonnalli@gmail.com
“A cooperative is an autonomous association of persons united
voluntarily to meet their common economic, social and cultural needs and
aspirations through a jointly-owned and democratically controlled enterprise”.
They are business entities where people work together to solve
common problems, seize exciting opportunities and provide themselves with goods
and services. A cooperative is managed on the basis that the customers of a
business are also the owners of the business. Each customer is entitled to
become a member of the cooperative society, thereby receiving the benefit of
success via a dividend payout.
The beginning of this great movement is dated back to 1844, when a
group of men known as the ‘Rochdale Pioneers’ began
trade in grocery produces in England, based on a ‘new’ principles of fair
prices for reliable quality goods. These organizations are better recognized
worldwide, for their non-profit character and root level social functioning on
voluntary basis. Voluntary and open membership, democratic member control,
member economic participation, autonomy and independence, education, training
and information, cooperation among cooperatives and concern for community are
the principles of cooperatives.
Self help, self responsibility, democracy, equality, equity and
solidarity are the values of cooperative organizations. In the tradition of its
founders, the movement also follows such ethical values as honesty, openness,
social responsibility and caring for others. Needless to say, it is a social
movement and its growth will unanimously result in the wholesome growth of the
society.
“Cooperative marketing” can mean many things to many people
depending upon your background. I like to ask people if they are using the word
“cooperative” as a noun or an adjective. In the context of this fact sheet, we
will be exploring “cooperative” as both a noun referring to a legal business
structure and as an adjective to describe the agreement of people to cooperate
with each other related to marketing efforts.
Let’s deal with the legal business structure of a cooperative.
Cooperative businesses are a type of corporation but have a few qualities that
make them an attractive option for many small groups that want to maintain
member ownership of the business. Cooperatives have three distinct characteristics
that separate them from other businesses. Cooperatives are member-owned,
member-controlled, and generate member-benefit. Member-owned is a function that
guarantees that the members of the cooperative are the ones that provide the
initial capital for the start-up of the business and are the current owners of
the cooperative. Member-controlled continues down the same thought process
because the members are the ones that elect the board who is responsible for
making long-term decisions for the cooperative. The members are electing other
members to serve on the board and make these decisions for the total membership
of the cooperative. Member-benefit is the end result that ensures the profits
made by the cooperative are being returned to the members, sometimes referred
to as patronage refunds. These profits are not being returned based on the
investment the members made in the cooperative, but rather the amount of
business that members conducted with the cooperative throughout the year. For
example, if you are a member of the cooperative, but do not use any services or
purchase any products from the cooperative during the year, you have no
member-benefit or patronage refunds coming your way at the end of the year.
If you and your neighbor agree to sell your products in one
roadside stand, you are practicing cooperative marketing. When you use
cooperative as an adjective it describes the behavior or agreement of two or
more parties in relation to marketing. These cooperative marketing arrangements
are usually informal and have no legal binding between or among the parties
involved. These cooperative marketing agreements can last years and never have
problems; however, sometimes group dynamics make these agreements unpleasant
and useless for the parties involved. There are many reasons why parties join a
cooperative business or participate in a cooperative marketing arrangement.
Benefits of Cooperative
Marketing
Economies of scale
There are economies of scale that can be obtained from the
collective effort of joining forces and marketing as a group. It would be
cheaper for beef producers to come together and assemble a semi-load of feeder
calves for shipping to Kansas than it would be for each individual to get their
calves to Kansas. When you are buying supplies, a consolidated order that
contains pallets or bulk orders is cheaper than individually buying a small
amount of supplies.
Utopian principles:
The principles themselves are the strength of cooperative
business. The open and voluntary membership and democratic member control (one
member; one vote) concepts strives to ensure equal growth opportunities to all
citizens of the state who have common business needs and aspirations. It also
ensures their direct participation in the business.
Non profit character:
Cooperatives are basically welfare driven rather than being profit
driven. This doesn’t mean they are charitable like, but protecting and
promoting the economic and social well being of their members is the primary
concern of cooperatives. The concept of ‘member economic participation’ insists
economic benefits to members via dividend payout in proportion to their
business involvement, ‘the higher you participate in the business; higher will
be your dividend’. This is an effective stimulus which encourages member’s
involvement in cooperative business.
Bargaining power
Many of the defects of the present agricultural marketing system
arise because often ignorant and illiterate farmers(as an individual) has to
face well organized mass of clever intermediaries. If the farmers join hands
and for a cooperative, naturally they will be less prone to exploitation and
malpractices. Instead of marketing their produce separately, they will market
it together through one agency.
Apart from it the group effort can combine available supply of
product or consolidate services offered that allow bargaining power for the
group. If you have 2 quintal of tomatoes, you have little power to negotiate a
price with a retailer, but if as a group you have 140 quintal of tomatoes, you
can bargain for a better price because of the quantity that can be supplied by
the group. This bargain force can be used to gain additional economies of scale
with bulk purchasing arrangements.
Direct dealing with final buyers
In cases, the co-operatives can altogether skip the intermediaries
and enter into direct relations with the final buyers. This practice will
eliminate exploiters and ensures fair prices to both the producers and the
consumers.
Provision of Credit
The marketing co-operative societies provide credit to the farmers
to save them from the necessary of selling their produce immediately after
harvesting. This ensures better returns to the farmers.
Easier and Cheaper Transport
Bulk transport of agricultural produce by the societies is often
easier and cheaper. Sometimes the societies have their own means of transport.
This further reduces cost and botheration of transporting produce to the
market.
Flow of product
Retail markets require some consistency in flow of product to
their establishments. As an individual with 12 doe goats, you can in no way
guarantee more than 2 kid goats per month for the year. Retailers are looking
for a business that can provide them a set amount of product on a daily,
weekly, or monthly basis. If you get together with 20 other producers and as a
group you have 240 doe goats, you could guarantee up to 40 kid goats per month
to the retailer. You will now have their attention and be able to negotiate a
price that the group needs for the kid goats.
Preserving markets
Many markets are looking to reduce the costs of obtaining products
or services. These markets are looking at buying their products or services but
dealing with less people and having the same amount of product to sell through
their establishments. If you are trying to market your 10 finished hogs to a
processor and the cooperative down the road has members with 120 hogs ready for
slaughter, the buyer will stop at the cooperative to make his purchase. He can obtain 120 hogs in one contact versus
the contact with 12 producers your size to end up with the same end result. A
cooperative marketing arrangement will preserve many of the markets you use for
the future as businesses move to cutting costs associated with procuring
products and services.
Access to professional
assistance/expertise (hire support)
Many producers can benefit from professional services in marketing
and sales of their products. If you are an apple producer, you are probably in
the business because you are good at producing apples, but you have to sell
them to make any profit. If marketing and sales are not your “cup of tea,” you
are a member of the majority of today’s agricultural producers. If you join a
cooperative marketing group that hired a marketing manager and all you had to do
was raise a top quality apple for the person to market, your life would be much
easier. You individually could not afford to hire that marketing manager, but
as a group of 15 orchard owners you can consolidate your product and finances
to increase the price you will receive for your product.
Challenges of Cooperative
Marketing
The first step in moving towards a cooperative marketing
arrangement is to make sure all individuals are on the same page. This is
achieved by making sure that all members are onboard to operate for the same
purpose. Most of the time, this is not present among the members, even though
most groups or steering committee members think that they all want the same end
result. Again, a facilitator can help the group move through this process,
because a common vision is essential for moving any further on the marketing
venture.
Trust and sharing of information
Many agricultural producers have operated individually for years
and are skeptical about the idea of a cooperative marketing venture. There is a
time and process for building a sense of trust among the members and generating
an open sharing of information in relation to the cooperative marketing
venture. This trust must occur among members to keep members loyal and make the
effort function successfully in the future. You are going into business with
all members of the effort and if you have trust issues, why would you ever
agree to run a business with these people? This is a major roadblock for many
groups but some facilitated discussions can be held with professionals who are
experienced in dealing with the human components of cooperative marketing
organizations.
Group dynamics (democratic group
decision making and costs)
The group dynamic aspect of an organization depends somewhat on
the size of the organization. A large cooperative marketing effort would have a
board of directors that govern the long-range planning and decision making for
the cooperative, but in a case where the group only consists of 20 or 25
members all members might participate in making decisions. Most understand that
a democratic process for making decisions ensures that the members are involved
and their opinions are addressed, but the fact is that this process can take
more time to reach the end goal of a decision. Some organizations operate on a
basis that consensus has to be reached by all for the decisions to go forward.
This is different than a democratic majority vote system and can take much more
time for plans to move forward.
Lack of commitment from members
Members can become disloyal members in the blink of an eye. This
behavior exhibits why it is important that members “buy into” the vision for
the group, have a developed trust for all members, and understand the need for
sharing information and managing the group dynamics in the cooperative
marketing organization. Human nature tells us that a member will sell outside
the organization if he or she can make a rupee more. A large majority of
producers would choose to market only with the organization when it can benefit
the member.
CONCLUSION:
There are several benefits to joining a cooperative marketing
venture: obtaining economies of scale, entering new market(s), accessing
professional services, maintaining more of the retail dollar, increasing bargaining
power, and preserving existing markets. These can benefit our operation by
increased profits and efficiency, but one need to consider the challenges
before making the final decision. The challenges are not to discourage from
joining a cooperative marketing organization, but rather to make aware that
with benefits come challenges for the organization. These are all related to
the human dynamics, commitment, and trust of the members who operate and own
the organization. When it comes to generating income, many of us choose the
option that will bring us the highest reward in the near future. With
cooperative marketing organizations, we have to look at the reward we receive
throughout the year from the organization. Is the average as a member of the
effort better than the average you would have achieved as an individual? This
requires looking at the “whole picture” and determining the best option for the
future success of operation.
REFERENCES:
1. King, Robert, and Gigi DiGiacomo. 2000.
Collaborative Marketing: A Roadmap and Resource Guide for Farmers. Minnesota
Institute for Sustainable Agriculture (MISA).
2. Mather, J. Warren, and Homer J.
Preston. 1980. Reprinted 1990. Cooperative Information Report 1, Section 3:
Cooperative Benefits and Limitations. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Rural
Business Cooperative Development Service.
3. Rapp, Galen. 1995. Cooperative
Information Report, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Rural
Business Cooperative Development Services.
4. SARE/ SAN. 2003. Reap New
Profits: Marketing Strategies for Farmers and Ranchers. USDA Sustainable
Agriculture Network (SAN).
Received on 19.06.2013 Modified on 15.07.2014
Accepted on 20.07.2013 © A&V Publication all right reserved
Asian J. Management 5(3):
July-September, 2014 page 332-334