Reinventing IHRM Factors for Expatriate Satisfaction
in IT Sector in Asia and Outside Asia.
Mrs. Vibha Sharma1, Dr. Mitu G. Matta2
1Research
Scholar, Lingya’s University, Faridabad India.
2Associate
Professor, Lingya’s University, Business Administration Department, Nachauli,
Jasana Road, Old Faridabad, Haryana India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: vibha85sharma@gmail.com,
mitu.matta@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Expatriates
are significant workforce for any MNCs in IT Sector. As the world becomes a
smaller place with different cultures workforce working together, the need for
International Managers increases to understand clients and teams. It is
critical to retain an expat employee in a competitive environment. The IHRM
factors and policies and practices are critical for any IT organization to
retain its talent. In the light of this the objective of the study is to
analyse the various determinants and factors of IHRM in designing the policies
and practices for expatriate. It is also worth analyzing what changes have
occurred in these IHRM strategies in the light of global economic crisis.
KEYWORDS:
Expatriate, Satisfaction, IHRM,
Policies and Practices, Determinants.
1.
INTRODUCTION:
The emerging significance of Multi-National
Companies (MNCs) and the requirement to compete in a globalized market has led
to the prominence and upsurge in international assignments. Ever since the
‘90s, the IT sector in India has drawn continuous attention across the globe
(Upadhya, C. 2009). Multinational companies send their IT workers for
onsite work, which is reflected to be as a primary requisite of IT work (Upadhya, C. 2009). An extremely
small percentage of these employees move to their onsite appointments at client
locations, to work closely with them and define project requirements,
coordinate with the offshore team on a regular basis and secure business from
clients. (Upadhya, C. and Vasavi, A.R. 2006; Agarwal, N.M., Khatri, N. and
Srinivasan, R. 2012).
According
to the NASSCOM report, Indian IT-BPM sector is expected to grow and achieve its
estimated target of USD 225 billion by 2020. Since 1990 till 2015, the IT
sector has shown a spectacular growth in revenue, employees, no of firms, GDP
share, export share and global sourcing share. According to a NASSCOM report,
IT-BPM Industry Global market in the year 2015 has aggregated a global spend of
about USD 1.2 trillion and the global sourcing at USD 162-166 billion, with a
phenomenal growth of 8.5% with the global presence in more than 80 countries.
India is the top most sourcing locations in global IT-BPM market, with a
presence in 50 locations. The Indian Market is showing a splendid growth in
every field in revenue which has grown by (8.5%), exports are up by (10.3%),
domestic are up by (3.2%) and employees are up by (6%).
The
Global IT sector is growing rapidly and has become robust as well as the demand
for international assignments is emerging as one of the important aspects of
International HRM. In this globalized and competitive era, to retain clients
internationally is a tremendous task of international managers and the global
workforce.
INTERNATIONAL
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT:
The evolution
of global business and economy has led to extensive search for human touch
leads to search for global competence – managerial, cultural and operational.
Global competence is embedded in organizational talent and its workforce with
its systems and leadership that manages and deploys it, but it is increasingly
embedded within a workforce that lies beyond the familiar boundaries of regular
full-time employment, and is empowered by technologies, platforms and
connectedness.
The
field of IHRM is evolving regularly with Lot of scope and importance in this
area. From the mid-1980s till 1990s, the field of IHRM was considered to be in
its ‘infancy’ (Laurent, A. 1986). Since its early stages, there has both an
evolution of territory covered by the IHRM field as well as more critical
discussion of whether this evolution has been towards an expanded field or not.
Thus, International Human Resource Management (IHRM) as a term has evolved and
now it is defined to include several components/practices in its ambit.
However, there is no consensus about what the term IHRM Covers, although most studies in the area have traditionally
focused on the area of expatriation (Brewster, C., and Harris, H., 1999) In the
initial phases, attention in IHRM is focused on the selection (identifying
predictors of success) and compensation of expatriate employees (Reynolds, C.
1997; Schneider, S and Tung, R. 2001; Schuler, R.S., and Jackson, S.E., 2005).
Today the management of expatriates continues to be a significant IHRM activity
and an active area of research (Shaffer, M.A., Kraimer, M.L., Chen, Y.P. and
Bolino, M.C., 2012).
International
HRM is concerned with identifying and understanding how MNCs manage their
geographically dispersed workforces in order to leverage their HR resources for
both local and global competitive advantage (Schuler, R.S., Budhwar, P.S. and
Florkowski, G.W. (2002).
According
to P.V. Morgan model the main IHRM Activities are procurement, allocation and
utilization of human resources focusing on all the six activities of domestics
HRM i.e., HR planning, Employees Hiring, Training and Development,
Remuneration, Performance Management and Industrial Relations. According to
Black et al (1991) he develops a theoretical frame work of International
adjustment which he divided into Anticipatory Adjustment which is prior to the
assignment phase and In -country Adjustment which is identified as on
assignment phase for expatriates. In the table 1.1 the IHRM practices
are shown on the basis of pre assignment and on assignment phase and what are
the various areas covered in these phases.
IHRM
PRACTICES FOR EXPATRIATES:
Table1.1
IHRM Practices
Pre assignment Phase |
On Assignment Phase |
Candidate preparation |
Organisational support system |
Pre departure Training |
Perceived organizational Support |
Family Preparation. |
Work factors |
|
Non work factors |
|
Family factors |
Harvey, M. and Moeller, M., (2009), in their study
proposed a model of IHRM process and identified eight stages of the HRM process
for expatriates, Identification, Selection, Training and Development,
Compensation, Performance Appraisal, Retention and Turnover, Succession
Planning and Repatriation. Recently, definitions have been extended to
cover localization of management, international coordination, global leadership
development and the emerging cultural challenges of global knowledge management
(Evans, P., Pucik, V. and Barsoux, J.L., 2002), This suggests that developing
future global leaders is a key priority in the management of human resources in
the global firm (Gregerson et al., 1998; Scullion, H. and Starkey, K., 2000).
2.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE:
2.1
IT sector in India and HRM:
Agrawal, N.M. and Thite,
M. (2003) in their paper had tried to
explore Indian software industry with the focus on its one of critical
challenges: HRM. In yet another study, Agarwal, et.al (2006) had discussed the
difficulties faced by Indian IT project leaders in running their projects and
the need for soft skills. Budhwar, P.S., Luthar, H.K. and Bhatnagar, J. (2006)
in their study had attempted to examine the BPO of Indian IT industry and to
distinguish the dynamics of Human Resource management practices and systems. Upadhya, C. and Vasavi, A.R. (2006),
in their research report tried to examine the Indian IT workforce.
The main objective of the report is to document the social and cultural
transformations that have been set in motion by the rapid growth of the IT and
ITES industries in India and to throw some light on big process of
globalization. Friedmann, C., Holtbrugge, D. and Puck, J. (2008) in
their article has highlighted that human resource management faces challenges
in Indian software industry. However, this unprecedented growth of the software
industry has brought several HRM opportunities to counter these challenges from
an HR perspective. The above Extant literature on IT industry and HRM issues
shows that there are researches in the IT industry and its HRM practices
(Agrawal, N.M. and Thite, M. (2003), Budhwar, P.S., Luthar, H.K. and Bhatnagar, J.
(2006), Paul, A.K. and Anantharaman, R.N. (2008), Friedmann,
C., Holtbrugge, D. and Puck, J. (2008), Agarwal, N.M., Khatri, N. and
Srinivasan, R. 2012) but they have not looked
at the HRM issues while sending IT expatriates on international assignments.
2.2
IHRM Determinants and Expatriate Satisfaction:
In
their seminal work, Naumann, E. (1993), in his study tried to explore
the factors, which were under the control of the organization and has the
potential to predict expatriate job satisfaction.
Downes,
M., Thomas, A.S. and McLarney, C. (2000), in their study focused on international transfer of knowledge and corporate
learning that were the determinants in overall satisfaction of expatriates. The
results showed that satisfaction is significantly related to performance of the
organization as a whole.
Bonache,
J., Brewster, C. and Suutari, V. (2001), in their study focused on the critical
issues like Expatriation Strategy, Selection and Pre-Departure training,
Compensation, Performance Management, Repatriation and Career Management. The
burgeoning research in the field is set into context and a plea made for a more
varied and imaginative research agenda.
Downes, M., Thomas,
A.S., Singley, R.B. (2002), in their
study tried
to examines the concept, as the companies gain experience in the global
marketplace; the determinants of job satisfaction vary. Findings partially
support this theoretical argument and confirm the expectation that the impact
of mentoring on satisfaction will lessen over the course of firm
internationalization. Further, the impact of training on expatriate
satisfaction was more pronounced for highly internationalized firms than for
those with limited exposure abroad.
In context of
compensation, Schraeder, M. and Sims, R.H. (2005), identified compensation approaches as primarily
focused on host country cost of living, housing, dependent education, tax
implications and health care factors and secondary approaches. Yongsun
Paik, K. Praveen Parboteeah and Wonshul Shim (2007), said compensation is
significantly related to commitment is very important and it further suggested
that commitment is positively related to job satisfaction and performance.
In relation to Organizational support and family adjustment, Avril, A.B. and Magnini,
V.P., (2007), in their study focused on holistic Selection, Training and
Organizational Support approach. The research laid emphasis on variables namely
family status, emotional intelligence, dietary and exercise habits, and his/her
learning orientation which helps in improving expatriate success in hotel
industry.
As per, Ching-Hsiang Liu Hung-Wen Lee, (2008) found the relationship
between job satisfaction, family support, learning orientation, organizational
socialization and cross-cultural training and cross-cultural adjustment in the
proposed model. This study found that job satisfaction played an important role
in the proposed model of expatriate adjustment in an international assignment.
Also found to be of importance was the role of organization socialization.
Evelina,
M. Ascalon, D. J., and Schleicher, M.B., (2008), in their study, suggested that
Cross Cultural Social Intelligence (CCSI) is important for selecting and
developing expatriates and other employees in Cross-culture context. Littrell,
L.N. and Salas, E. (2005), in their study tried to find out what best practices
are required for Cross-cultural training (CCT) and to know what the
organization is doing right now and what they should be doing to understand
expatriate needs.
Shortland, S., (2009), suggested the most promising
theoretical explanation of women’s low participation as expatriates is
identified as being linked to gender stereotyping reinforced within an
isomorphic institutional framework.
Benson, G.S. and Pattie, M. (2009), found that The
Host Country Supervisor had influences on present country and short term
outcomes related to adjustment and completion of assignments. Home country
supervisors have greater influences on overall fitness in the job and
longer-term perceptions of how the overseas assignment will impact their
career. The result suggested that home and host supervisor influence
expatriates differently.
in
their study, tried to identify factors that impact expatriate satisfaction in
the software industry. It was found that Job Considerations and Career Growth,
Pre-assignment Preparedness, Acculturation and Adjustment, Family Issues and
Organizational Attitude towards Repatriation were identified factors through
exploratory factor analysis. There exists a significant relation between Job
Considerations and Career Growth and Organizational Attitude towards Repatriation
towards expatriate satisfaction.
The review of literature on IHRM helps in identifying
collaborative variables which are vital for expatriates and companies who are
sending them on international assignments. A large number of the researches are
done in expatriate experience and adjustment on assignment, their job
performance on international assignment, job satisfaction on international
assignment. Researchers are done in individual fields also like Predictors for
expatriate adjustment on international assignment, Cross culture adjustment,
Pre-departure and CCT training and Repatriation adjustment, Women stereotyping
as International Managers and Expatriate compensation. The present study is
covering nearly eight demographics variables and 40 IHRM practices variables
after doing a rigorous research review. The variables in the present study are
generally covering the areas of Cross Cultural Training, Job Consideration,
Organizational Support, Socialization, Compensation and allowances, Supervision
and Promotional opportunities and Career Support and Skills, Colleagues,
Language and Family Issues. They are important for employees as well as MNCs.
3.
RESEARCH OBJETIVE:
1. To
propose IHRM factors influencing Expat satisfaction among Indian origin IT
expats working on international assignment in Asia and outside Asia
2. To
relatively analyze the impact of these IHRM factors on overall Expat
satisfaction.
· H01: Cross-Cultural Training has no
significant effect on overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on
assignment in Asia and outside Asia.
· Ha1: Cross-Cultural Training has a significant effect
on overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on assignment in Asia and
outside Asia.
· H02: On- job support has no significant
effect on overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on assignment in Asia
and outside Asia.
· Ha2: On- job support has a significant effect on
overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on assignment in Asia and outside
Asia.
· H03: Social Acceptance has no significant
effect on overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on assignment in Asia
and outside Asia.
· Ha3: Social Acceptance has a significant effect on
overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on assignment in Asia and outside
Asia.
· H04: Pre-Departure Training has no
significant effect on overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on
assignment in Asia and outside Asia.
· Ha4: Pre-Departure Training has a significant effect
on overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on assignment in Asia and
outside Asia.
· H05 Remuneration has no significant effect on overall
Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on assignment in Asia and outside Asia.
· Ha5: Remuneration has
a significant effect on overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on
assignment in Asia and outside Asia.
· H06: Role Importance has no significant
effect on overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on assignment in Asia
and outside Asia.
· Ha6: Role Importance has a significant effect on
overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on assignment in Asia and outside
Asia.
· H07: Expat Allowance has no significant effect on overall Satisfaction
for Indian origin expats on assignment in Asia and outside Asia.
· Ha7: Expat Allowance has
a significant effect on overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on
assignment in Asia and outside Asia.
· H08: Promotional Opportunity and
Supervision has no significant effect on overall Satisfaction for Indian origin
expats on assignment in Asia and outside Asia.
· Ha8: Promotional Opportunity and Supervision has a
significant effect on overall Satisfaction for Indian origin expats on
assignment in Asia and outside Asia.
4.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
This
research is conducted in 2015-2016.An exploratory-cum-descriptive research
design is used to understand the review of literature and helps in the
formulation of objectives and hypothesis as well as identifying the variables
for the present study. It is later on followed by descriptive research to
design a questionnaire, data is collected using quantitative survey with the
help of Likert five point scales, analyzing the data, testing the hypothesis
and drawing the final conclusion. A systematic non-probability judgmental
sampling is used as a technique to collect data. A structured questionnaire is
constructed from the Scales of expatriation studies of Naumann 1993; Downes
2000; Koteshwari and Bhattacharya, 2007, Black (1980), Selmer (1995) and Adler
(2002), Christelle Tornikoski (2011) and ABRIDGE JDI INDEX, Bowling Green State
University 1975-2000 and one or two questions developed by author of the
research also.
The
data collection was done with help of on line websites to collect the data and
is sent to respondents in Asia (Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore) and Non Asia
(US and UK), via: Facebook – Expat community pages, Linkedin – Expat
professional groups, Gmail contacts of known Expats, face to face interaction
by visiting IT companies (TCS, Infosys, Cognizant, DTAC, IBM, and DUNNHUMBY
etc.) and by participating in Expat community social events.
The
validity of the questionnaire is established taking items from many constructs
and reliability is also established using Cronbach’s alpha. The table 4.1
indicates the reliability statistics of all the items.
Table
4.1 Reliability statistics of all the items
Reliability Statistics |
|
Cronbach's Alpha |
N of Items |
.943 |
45 |
5.
ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS:
IHRM
factors impacting the Expat satisfaction is Factor analysed using the
Exploratory Factor Analysis technique (EFA). The tools for analyzing the data
are MS Excel for data entry and analysis of data is done using SPSS 19.0. In
total data is collected through 141 expatriate working in Asia and outside Asia.
Out of 141questionnaires collected
· 80.9 % were males and 19.1% were females
· Maximum respondents are from the age group of 25-35
years and 35-45 years.
· 54.6% of the respondents are married with children.
· Most of the respondents are at the middle level i.e.
53.9 % and senior positions 44%.
· As far as region, 73 respondents out of 141 are from
Asia and 68 respondents out of 141 are from Non Asian countries.
· In Expat tenure the majority of respondents are above
5 years of experience i.e. 42.1%.
5.1 FACTOR ANALYSIS:
Factor
analysis also called as the ‘Exploratory Factor Analysis’ (EFA) is a method
used for reducing the number of variables in a data. At the onset it was
pertinent to check whether the data set was suitable for Factor Analysis or
not. This was checked using the KMO and the Bartlett tests shown in table 5.1
which yielded desirable values to proceed further with Factor Analysis.
Table
5.1: Table Of KMO and Bartlett's Testa
KMO and Bartlett's Testa |
||
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy. |
.884 |
|
Bartlett's Test of Sphericity |
Approx. Chi-Square |
3629.096 |
Df |
780 |
|
Sig. |
.000 |
|
a. Only cases for which Segment = ALL are used in the analysis phase. |
The
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy shown in table 5.1 was. 884,
above the commonly recommended value of. 6, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity
was significant χ2 = 780, p < .05. As a step further, Reliability tests
were also conducted using the Cronbach Alpha scores and it was found satisfactory.
The overall reliability score of all the 45 variables is .943 and all the 9
factors combine is .856. The values of the Cronbach Alpha for the factors so
extracted are individually presented in the table no 5.2. And factor loading
column shows all the highest values ranging from (-1 to +1).
Table
5.2 FACTOR ANALYSIS FOR COMPONENTS AND VARIATION
Name of the Dimension |
Item No |
Statements |
Factor Loadings |
Variation % |
Reliability Cronbach’s Alpha |
Cross Cultural Training |
6 |
Please rate the effectiveness of Attribution training |
.865 |
33.783 |
0.943 |
7 |
Please rate the effectiveness of Cultural Awareness Training |
.823 |
|||
8 |
Please rate the effectiveness of Language training |
.849 |
|||
9 |
Please rate the effectiveness of Didactic training |
.902 |
|||
10 |
Please rate the effectiveness of Experiential training |
.837 |
|||
On Job Support |
17 |
I can communicate and socialize with my work group in the new country. |
.461 |
8.685 |
0.892 |
18 |
I receive support from colleagues in my expat assignment without any discrimination as to my nationality. |
.723 |
|||
19 |
My co-workers are willing to listen to my personal problems if I approach them, like they would in my native place. |
.644 |
|||
20 |
My supervisor back home explained how this job would positively impact my career |
.535 |
|||
21 |
I shall be considered for future opportunities if I perform well in this assignment as compared to other employees in the host country. |
.709 |
|||
22 |
I am given adequate opportunity for learning and development in the course of my assignment as others employees in the host country. |
.654 |
|||
23 |
I can understand my career progression compared to my national employees in relation to my present assignment |
.663 |
|||
Social Acceptance |
25 |
I feel that my immediate family has adjusted to the new culture and environment. |
.601 |
5.734 |
0.840 |
26 |
I understand the ‘dual career spouse issues’ on my expat assignment. |
.367 |
|||
27 |
I celebrate Festivals with the usual spirit as in my home country |
.643 |
|||
28 |
I am comfortable in participating in ethnic group activities |
.710 |
|||
29 |
I feel comfortable in socializing with locals outside my work |
.783 |
|||
30 |
I like Culinary/food choices that I find here |
.698 |
|||
Pre Departure Training |
1 |
My willingness to relocate was discussed with me prior to my selection for the assignment |
.672 |
4.508 |
0.859 |
2 |
On selection I was clearly briefed of my responsibilities/job requirements. |
.537 |
|||
3 |
On selection I was supported by HR for relocation expenses, like air fare expenses, housing facilities, and kids schooling |
.596 |
|||
4 |
I got sufficient time to prepare prior to leaving for the assignment. |
.648 |
|||
5 |
Pre-departure training including, Visa interview training were provided to me prior to my assignment. |
.726 |
|||
16 |
I have ample connectivity with team back home w.r.t my assignment |
.462 |
|||
Expat Remuneration |
14 |
I feel that my remuneration package is at par with other expats in the region. |
.663 |
4.233 |
0.775 |
15 |
I am given due vacation adjustments to visit home. |
.642 |
|||
38 |
Think of the pay you get now. |
.666 |
|||
Role Importance |
11 |
I feel that my work responsibilities here are more than work back home |
.776 |
3.500 |
0.781 |
12 |
I am given ample autonomy for my performance as compared to other employees |
.649 |
|||
13 |
My role is significant in the project as compared to other employees. |
.640 |
|||
24 |
I expect to gain significant business skills during my expat assignment |
.485 |
|||
Expat Allowance |
32 |
I feel that the Travel , Health and Accident insurance coverage is adequate as per my expectations on assignment |
.755 |
3.332 |
0.757 |
33 |
I feel that the Housing allowance, Education and Travel allowance is adequate as per my expectations on assignment |
.519 |
|||
35 |
I have the provision of Relocation allowance (compensation for cost of physical transfer for entire family) |
.625 |
|||
Promotional Opportunity and Supervision |
39 |
I am satisfied with the promotional opportunities in this expat assignment |
.721 |
2.916 |
0.677 |
40 |
I am satisfied with the kind of supervision I have received |
.735 |
|||
Local Barriers, People and Language |
31 |
I am conversant with local language in my present assignment. |
.464 |
2.577 |
0.412 |
36 |
I am satisfied with majority of the peers with whom I work |
.538 |
|||
37 |
I am satisfied with my current job profile. |
.705 |
IHRM
Factors /Components:
The
9 significant factors are tested for reliability using the technique of
Cronbach’s Alpha and all the factors scores are greater than 0.6 except one.
Two factors are dropped one dual career allowance that include only one
question and local barrier people and language is dropped because the
reliability score is less that .6 and From the ten major factors ,eight
factors are important for expatriates IHRM practices.
CROSS CULTURAL TRAINING (CCT) contain 5 items and
explained 33.783% variance in the data. CCT has been identified as a major
technique for improving the cross-cultural effectiveness of managers (Bhagat
and Prien, 1996; Bhawuk and Brislin, 2000; Deshpande and Viswesvaran, 1992).
ON-JOB
SUPPORT contains 7 items and explained
8.685% variance in the data. For expats on job support generally deals with the
support from the oragnisation to better adjust to the international assignment.
The work environment with colleagues should be conducive and open so that expat
can easily interact with the work group and feel a sense of togetherness as a
team.
SOCIAL
ACCEPTANCE contains 6 items and
explained 5.734% variance in the data. Expats who are more open to culture and are more
extroverts and are more cultural flexible to accept new environment, traditions
and behavior and think of them as of the same value not less than other and are
sensitive to other culture have better adjustment abilities and job
performance.
PRE-
DEPARTURE TRAINING contains 6 items and
explained 4.508 %variance in the data. It is the orientation and training that
expatriates and their families receive before departure and have a major impact
on the success of the overseas assignment. Companies
should have formal training programs for expatriates and their families,
so that it helps and have a positive effect on cross-cultural adjustment.
EXPAT
REMUNERATION contains 3 items and explained 4.293%variance in the data.
Remuneration should be at par with market scenario of expats at global level
and with other colleagues, including all the major components of expat pay and
vacations. It is one of the key factors for expat satisfaction. Extrinsic
compensation includes both monetary and non-monetary rewards like:
· Premiums: Expat premium, COLA, Mobility and
installation cost.
· Tax: Tax and social security equalization and Tax and
social security protection.
· Benefits in kinds: Allowances for house, car, moving
and storage, health care and insurance.
· Family Package: Children scholarship and Assistance to
spouse to find a job.
· Departure Package: Intercultural training language
training and pre visit trip.
ROLE
IMPORTANCE contains 4 items and explained 3.500 %variance in the data. It is
one of the work factors that play an important part in adjustment of
expatriates. Role importance implies how critical expat’s assignment is to
overall organizational success. Expats wants their role to be important in the
present job profile which motivates them to work efficiently and satisfied as
this may significantly impact expat’s perception of his assignment.
EXPAT
ALLOWANCE contains 3 items and explained
3.332 %variance in the data. Major expat allowances are as follows i.e. The
Travel, Health and accidental insurance cover, Housing allowance, Educational
and travel allowances, relocation allowance. Most of the companies include
allowances in expatriate packages and called as benefits of expat packages like
housing, education, automobile, Home Travel, Hardship and other benefits
include language courses and medical and health care facility etc.
PROMOTIONAL
OPPORTUNITY AND SUPERVISION contains 2
items and explained 2.916 % variance in the data. The supervisor role is very
important on the job as he is the only one who appraises the performance and
provides guidance for future career path. It is said if your supervisor is good
and supportive; the employee will be stress free and works efficiently and more
satisfied with the job.
LOCAL
BARRIERS, PEOPLE and LANGUAGE contains 3
items and explained 2.727% variance in the data and value of CronBach’s alpha
is .412 < .6 for this factor which is less than .6, so this particular
factor has been dropped. The culture and language plays an important part in
Asian countries where the people are very strict about language and culture.
So, conclusively, the 8 IHRM factors namely Cross
Culture Training, On JOB Support, Social Acceptance, Pre departure Training,
Remuneration, Role Importance ,Expat Allowance and Promotional Opportunity and
Supervision have been retained form the analysis of this study. These factors
are consistent with the findings of other researchers studies of J. STEWART
Black, MARK MENDENHALL and GARY ODDOU (1991), Earl Naumann (1993) , Meredith Downes, Anisya S. Thomas, Rodger B. Singley, (2002), Robert H.
Sims, Mike Schraeder, (2005), Yongsun Paik, K. Praveen Parboteeah and Wonshul
Shim (2007),Ching-Hsiang Liu Hung-Wen Lee, (2008), Ma. Evelina Ascalon
Deidra J. Schleicher Marise Ph. Born, (2008)
Regression Analysis:
Further,
Regression analysis is conducted on these 8 IHRM factors to understand their
relative impact on the overall Expat Satisfaction. Regression Analysis provides
us with the equation which describes a statistical relation between one or more
predicted variable and response variable.
The table 5.3 indicates the value of R square = .540
and: the 8 major factors are used as predictors variables and the dependent
variable is overall satisfaction. It shows there is significant relationship
between predictors and the overall external satisfaction. And the Durbin Watson
value=1.924.
Table
5.3 Model Summaryb
Model |
R |
R Square |
Adjusted R Square |
Std. Error of the Estimate |
Change Statistics |
Durbin-Watson |
||||
R Square Change |
F Change |
df1 |
df2 |
Sig. F Change |
||||||
1 |
.735a |
.540 |
.520 |
.5261 |
.540 |
26.237 |
6 |
134 |
.000 |
1.924 |
a.
Predictors: (Constant), Promotional Oprtny
andamp; Supervision , Pre-Departure Training, Role Importance, Expat
Allowances, Social Acceptance, Expat Renumeration
b
Dependent Variable: overall external satisfaction
The
results of the Regression analysis in Table no 5.4 performed on all the
8 major factors reveal that the significance value of 2 factors was
insignificant. So, we reject the alternate hypotheses Ha1 andHa2 and accept the
null hypothesis for H01 and H02 for factors Cross culture training and on job
support. Two IHRM factors influencing the overall Satisfaction of the expats, namely,
Cross cultural Training p=0.666, On Job Support, p=0 .248 are insignificant
factors so they are rejected.
Table
5.4: Regression Coefficientsa
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
T |
Sig. |
95.0% Confidence Interval for B |
|||
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
Lower Bound |
Upper Bound |
||||
1 |
(Constant) |
.543 |
.311 |
|
1.750 |
.083 |
-.071 |
1.158 |
Cross Cultural Training |
.023 |
.052 |
.031 |
.432 |
.666 |
-.081 |
.126 |
|
On job support |
.110 |
.095 |
.111 |
1.161 |
.248 |
-.077 |
.297 |
|
Social Acceptance |
.148 |
.092 |
.132 |
1.612 |
.109 |
-.034 |
.331 |
|
Pre-Departure Training |
.097 |
.084 |
.105 |
1.162 |
.247 |
-.068 |
.263 |
|
Expat Renumeration |
.124 |
.072 |
.142 |
1.705 |
.091 |
-.020 |
.267 |
|
Expat Allowances |
.231 |
.070 |
.254 |
3.288 |
.001 |
.092 |
.369 |
|
Role Importance |
.088 |
.095 |
.074 |
.921 |
.359 |
-.101 |
.277 |
|
Promotional Oprtny andamp; Supervision |
.104 |
.055 |
.134 |
1.871 |
.064 |
-.006 |
.213 |
a.
Dependent Variable: overall external satisfaction
For
a more robust analysis and clarifying the results once again, after eliminating
the 2 factors, Regression analysis was carried out on 6 major factors; the
results of which are shown in the table 5.5. Table 5.5 indicates that 5 major
factors are significant factors, so the null hypotheses is rejected and the
alternate hypothesis is accepted Ha3, Ha4, Ha5, Ha6 and Ha8 who’s significant
value i.e. p value <.05 which are as follows Social Acceptance,
Pre-departure Training, Expat remuneration, Expat allowances and Promotional
Opportunity and Supervision. It means there is a significant relationship
between the predictor variables and the dependent variable i.e. overall
external satisfaction.
Table
5.5: Regression Coefficientsa
Model |
Unstandardized Coefficients |
Standardized Coefficients |
T |
Sig. |
95.0% Confidence Interval for B |
Collinearity Statistics |
||||
B |
Std. Error |
Beta |
Lower Bound |
Upper Bound |
Tolerance |
VIF |
||||
1 |
(Constant) |
.582 |
.307 |
|
1.895 |
.060 |
-.025 |
1.190 |
|
|
Social Acceptance |
.196 |
.085 |
.175 |
2.294 |
.023 |
.027 |
.364 |
.593 |
1.687 |
|
Pre-Departure Training |
.154 |
.073 |
.166 |
2.111 |
.037 |
.010 |
.299 |
.552 |
1.812 |
|
Expat Remuneration |
.129 |
.072 |
.148 |
1.801 |
.074 |
-.013 |
.271 |
.507 |
1.974 |
|
Expat Allowances |
.229 |
.070 |
.252 |
3.264 |
.001 |
.090 |
.367 |
.575 |
1.740 |
|
Role Importance |
.090 |
.092 |
.076 |
.981 |
.328 |
-.092 |
.272 |
.578 |
1.729 |
|
Promotional Oprtny andamp; Supervision |
.113 |
.055 |
.147 |
2.055 |
.042 |
.004 |
.222 |
.675 |
1.481 |
The
linear model fit equation expressing the relationship between these 5 IHRM
factors (Independent Variable) and the Overall
Expat satisfaction (Dependent Variable) is expressed as follows:-
Final Linear Model Fit Equation Overall satisfaction= .582 (constant) + .196 * Social acceptance + .154 * Pre departure Training + .129 * Expat Remuneration + .229 * Expat Allowance + .113 * Supervision and promotional opportunity.
|
The
regression equation mentioned above indicates that OVERALL EXPAT SATISFACTION
will increase if SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE is higher in host country, or if more
emphasis is given on PRE DEPARTURE TRAINING in home country, or if higher EXPAT
RENUMERATION and EXPAT ALLOWANCE is provided, or if higher SUPERVISION and
PROMOTIONAL OPPORTUNITY exists in expat assignment.
The
estimated increase in the OVERALL EXPAT SATISFACTION for every unit increase in
these individual independent variables is given by coefficient values of these
respective variables. That implies, if SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE is increased by 1
scale unit, then OVERALL EXPAT SATISFACTION is estimated to increase by 0.196,
other independent variables remaining constant. Similarly if the level of PRE
DEPARTURE TRAINING is increased by 1 scale unit, then OVERALL EXPAT
SATISFACTION is estimated to increase by 0.154, other independent variables
remaining constant.
6. MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS:
The main Implication of this research is
identification of various factors that affect the expat satisfaction and then
carefully identifying their impact on overall expat satisfaction. Out of these
10 factors the results shows that 8 major factors are significant for expat
satisfaction. So HR of IT sector industries should keep these major aspects and
factors in designing the policy for expats. The 8 major factors are as follows:
CCT, On job support, Social Acceptance, Pre Departure Training, Expat
Remuneration, Role Importance, Expat Allowance and Promotional Opportunity and Supervision.
The 5 major factors that came out as significant for
expatriates are Social Acceptance, Pre Departure Training, Expat Remuneration,
Expat Allowance and Promotional Opportunity and Supervision. This is consistent
with the factors highlighted in the study of Liu, C.H. and Lee, H.W., (2008), and
proposed that for ‘Job satisfaction’ –, family
support, learning orientation, organizational socialization and cross-cultural
training to be very important. HR managers should incorporate and focus on
these factors for expatriates on international assignment. The paper recommends
that the linear model fit equation will help HR managers to find out the
overall satisfaction level of expatriates and work accordingly. The
former researchers had
So, it can be recommended in this perspective that
cross-cultural adjustments (including family adjustments) should be duly
considered for the expatriates. Moreover, firms should be concerned with the
meeting the Career Growth aspirations even in after repatriation. IHRM policies
should give weightage to aspects, like Pre-assignment preparedness, of the
expatriates Acculturation and Adjustment, Family Issues and Organizational
Attitude towards Repatriation.
So, it is recommended that while designing IHRM
policies, it is important consider host-country cost of living, housing,
dependent education, tax implications and health care along with the pay differentials.
Infact, Compensation is a major reason behind expatriation and so there are
lots of expectations in this regard. This is consistent with the results of
Yongsun Paik,
Y., Parboteeah, K.P. and Shim, W. (2007) and Tornikoski, C. (2011). It
can be recommended that one of the primary approaches to a good expatriate
Compensation design should include destination-based considerations and address
the risk associated with relocations, including the family cost of adjustments
in a new culture.
It
was found that significant factors ranked i.e. Remuneration, allowance, social
acceptance and Pre-departure Training is more important. Hence, HR mangers
should highly focus on these significant factors for male and female
expatriates, so proper training facilities to employees and their families,
visa interviews and air travel arrangements and at par remuneration will lead
towards their satisfaction more.
It
is further recommended from the observations of this study that HR managers
should offer an equal opportunity to women also for expatriate assignments and
they should be provided with proper Pre-departure training and Remuneration
which should be at par with men. These findings are consistent with the
research studies of Hutchings, K., French, E. and Hatcher, T. (2008), who
examined an organizational and social network support for female expatriates
and suggested that there are significant gender related differences. Shortland,
S. (2009), also suggested that women’s low participation as expatriates was linked
to gender stereotyping. The data showed that majority of people are married
with children and married without children who are on expats roles.HR should
have proper policies of allowances in place for expatriate and their families
so that it covers their education health care and spouse adjustments also and
Expat allowances is one of the factor came out from the study also. This is
consistent with the research of Kelly P. Weeks, M., Weeks, K. and Muller, W.,
(2009) suggested that adolescents are effectively adjusted abroad that might
lead to expatriates’ longer stay on assignment than planned and effective
pre-departure training for all family members is important to expatriate
success. Schoepp, K. and Forstenlechner, I. (2010), suggested that that the environment
which has some stressors related to living abroad have been mitigated and
family act as a motivation to stay longer on the assignment than to leave. It
was found that region ratio is around 52:48. HR people of IT companies should
pay attention to people moving in Asian region. To provide them with proper pre
departure training, language training and cross culture training should be
given to expatriates and their families so that they better adjust to the
environment. It was found most of the expatriate are in young and middle age
group people so HR should invest in their young talent pool through training
and development and try to retain them.
1. Abdel, R.I., Elamin, A.M., and Aboelmaged, M.G. (2012), “Job
satisfaction among expatriate and national employees in an Arabian Gulf
context”, International Journal of Business Research and Development,
Vol. 1 (1), 1-16.
2. Adler, N.J. (1997), “International dimensions of organizational
behavior”. 3rd ed. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.
3. Adler, N.J., Black, J. and Mendenhall, M. (1992), “Managing globally
competent people”, Academy of Management Executive. Vol. 6 (3), 52-64.
4. Agrawal, N.M., Khatri, N. and Srinivasan, R. (2012), “Managing growth: Human
resource management challenges facing the Indian software industry”, Journal
of World Business, Vol. 47 (2), 159-166.
5. Agrawal, N. and Rao, M. (2002). “Developing human capital for the growth
of Indian software industry”. In: Pareek, U. (Ed.), Human Resource
Development in Asia: Trends and Challenges. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH
Publishing.
6. Agrawal N.M. and Thite, M. (2003), “Human resources issues, challenges
and strategies in the Indian software industry”, International Journal of
Human Resource Development Management, Vol. 3 (3), 249-63.
7. Agrawal N.M. and Thite, M. (2006), “Nature and importance of soft skills
in software project leaders”. Asia Pacific Management Review, Vol.11
(2), 405-413.
8. Ahad, M., Hyder,
O.A. (2008), “Repatriation readjustment of international managers”, Career
Development International. Vol. 13 (5), 456–475.
9. Al-Asfour, A. (2012), “Empirical investigation into
compensation preferences for diversified employees”, International Journal
of Human Resource Studies” Vol. 2 (4), ISSN 2162-3058.
10. Angelo, D.S., Toh, S.
and Soo, M. (2005), “A local perspective to expatriate success”,
Academy of Management Executive. Vol. 19 (1), 132-146.
11. Avril, A.B. and Magnini,
V.P., (2007), "A holistic approach to expatriate success", International
Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 19 (1), 53–64.
12. Barakat,
A. and Moussa, F. (2014), “Variables influencing expatriate learning and
organizational learning", Competitiveness Review, Vol. 24 (4),
275-292.
13. Bashir,
S. (2012), “Perceived organizational support and the cross-cultural adjustment
of expatriates in the UAE", Education, Business and Society:
Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, Vol. 5 (1), 63–82.
14. Benson,
G.S. and Pattie, M. (2009), “The comparative roles of home9 and host
supervisors in the expatriate experience”, Human Resource Management,
Vol. 48 (1), 49–68.
15. Bhatti,
M.A., Kaur, S. and Mohamed, M.B. (2013), “Effects of individual characteristics
on expatriates' adjustment and job performance", European Journal of
Training and Development, Vol. 37 (6), 544–563.
16. Bhatti,
M.A., Mohamed, M.B. Ismail, A.R. (2013), “Expatriates adjustment and job
performance", International Journal of Productivity and Performance
Management, Vol. 62 (7), 694-717.
17. Black,
J.S. and Gregerson, H.B. (1999), “The right way to manage expats”. Harvard Business
Review, 52–63.
18. Black,
J.S., Gregerson, H.B., Mendenhall, M.E. and Stroh, L.K. (1999), “Globalizing
people through International assignments. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. ISBN
0201 43389 3.
19. Black,
J.S., Morrison, A.J., and Gregerson, H.B. (2000), “Global explorers: The
next generation of leaders. New York: Routledge, 131.
20. Black,
S.J., Mendenhall, M. and Oddou, G. (1991). “Toward a comprehensive model of
international adjustment: An integration of multiple theoretical perspectives”,
Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 (2), 291-317.
21. Bonache,
J., Brewster, C. and Suutari, V. (2001), “Expatriation: A developing research
agenda”, Thunderbird International Business Review, Vol. 43 (1) 3–20.
22. Bonsdorff,
V. and Monika, E. (2011), “Age-related differences in reward preferences”, The
International Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 22 (6), 1262–1276.
23. Brewster,
C., and Harris, H. (1999), “International HRM: Contemporary issues in Europe.
London: Routledge.
24. Budhwar,
P.S., Luthar, H.K. and Bhatnagar, J. (2006), “The dynamics of HRM systems in
Indian BPO firms”, Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 27, 339-360.
doi:10.1007/s12122-006-1027-7
25. Causin,
G.F., Ayoun, B. and Moreo, P. (2011), "Expatriation in the hotel
industry", International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management,
Vol. 23 (7), 885–901.
26. Cerimagic,
S. (2011), "Cross-cultural adaptivity and expatriate performance in the
United Arab Emirates", Education, Business and Society: Contemporary
Middle Eastern Issues, Vol. 4 (4), 303-312.
27. Chen,
F., Bapuji, H., Dyck, B. and Wang, X. (2012), “I learned more than I taught:
The hidden dimension of learning in intercultural knowledge transfer", The
Learning Organization, Vol. 19 (2), 109-120.
28. Chew, J. (2004),
“Managing MNC expatriates through crises: A challenge for international human
resource management”, Research and Practice in Human Resource
Management, Vol. 12 (2), 1-30.
29. Chien,
T.C. and McLean, G.N. (2011), “Intercultural training for US business
expatriates in Taiwan”, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol.35
(9), 858–873.
30. Chitakornkijsil,
P. (2010), “The internationalization of human resource management in the host
nation context and strategic approach of IHRM”. The International Journal of
Organizational Innovation. Vol. 3 (2), 379.
31. Christelle,
T. (2011), “Fostering expatriate affective commitment: A total reward
perspective”, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, Vol.
18 (2), 214–235.
32. Commander, S.J., Chanda,
R., Kangasniemi, M. and Winters, L.A., (2004). “Must skilled migration be a
brain drain? Evidence from the Indian software industry”, IZA Discussion
Paper No. 1422. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=632349
33. Connerley,
M.L., Mecham, R.L. and Strauss, J.P. (2008), “Gender differences in leadership
competencies, expatriate readiness, and performance”, Gender in Management:
An International Journal, Vol. 23 (5), 300–316.
34. Crowley,
H.M. (2007), “The protean career: Exemplified by first world foreign residents
in Western Europe?”, International Studies of Management and Organization, Vol.
37 (3), 44-64.
35. DeNisi, A.S. and Toh,
S.M., (2005), “A local perspective to expatriate success,”
Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 19 (1).
36. Dimitratos,
P., Johnson, J., Slow, J., and Young, S. (2003), “Micro multinationals: New
types of firms for the global competitive landscape”. European Management
Journal. Vol. 21 (2), 164–74.
37. Downes,
M., Thomas, A.S. and McLarney, C. (2000), "The cyclical effect of
expatriate satisfaction on organizational performance: The role of firm
international orientation", The Learning Organization, Vol. 7
(3), 122–134.
38. Dowling,
P.J., Welch, D.E. and Schuler, R.S. (1999), “International human resource
management: Managing people in an International context”, 3rd ed.
Cincinatti, OH: South Western College Publishing.
39. Downes, M., Thomas,
A.S., Singley, R.B. (2002), “Predicting expatriate job satisfaction: The role
of firm internationalization", Career Development International,
Vol. 7 (1), 24-3.
40. Downes,
M., Varner, I.I. and Hemmasi, M. (2010), "Individual profiles as
predictors of expatriate effectiveness", Competitiveness Review: An
International Business Journal, Vol. 20 (3), 235–247.
41. Doz,
Y. and Hamel, G. (1998), “Alliance advantage: The art of creating value
through partnering. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
42. Edstrom,
A. and Galbraith, J. (1977), “Transfer of managers as a coordination and
control strategy in multinational organizations”, Administrative Science
Quarterly, Vol. 22, 248–63.
43. Evans,
P., Pucik, V. and Barsoux, J.L. (2002), “The global challenge: Frameworks
for international human resource management”, New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
44. Evelina,
M. Ascalon, D. J., and Schleicher, M.B., (2008), “Cross-cultural social
intelligence", Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal”,
Vol. 15 (2), 109–130.
45. Friedmann,
C., Holtbrugge, D. and Puck, J. (2008), “HRM in foreign firms in India: A
resource-based view”, University of Erlangen Nuremberg, Nuremberg:
Labor and Socio-Economic Research Center, Laser Discussion Paper No. 15.
46. Froese,
F.J. and Peltokorpi, V. (2011), “Cultural distance and expatriate job
satisfaction”, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Vol. 35
(1), 49–60.
47. Gong,
Y., (2003) “Subsidiary staffing in multinational enterprises: Agency, resource,
and performance”, Academy of Management Journal”, Vol. 46 (6), 728–739.
48. Gregersen,
H., Morrison, A. and Black, J.S. (1998), “Developing leaders for the global
frontiers”, Sloan Management Review, 21–32.
49. Harris,
H., Brewster, C., and Sparrow, P. (2003). “International human resource
management”. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
50. Harrison, D.A., Shaffer, M.A. Shrinivas, P.B. (2004), “Going Places: Roads more and less
travelled in research on expatriate experiences”, In Ed. Research in Personnel and Human
Resources Management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 199-247.
51. Harvey,
M., and Moeller, M., (2009), “Expatriate Managers: A historical review”, International
Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 11 (3), 275-296.
52. Harvey,
M., Novicevic, M.M. (2002), “The co-ordination of strategic initiatives within
global organizations: The role of global teams”, International Journal of
Human Resource Management. Vol. 13 (4), 660–76.
53. Harvey,
M., Speier, C. and Novicevic, M.M. (1999), “The Role of impartation in global
staffing”, International Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 10
(3), 459–76.
54. Henha,
P.H. (2011) “Analysis of the perceptions of expatriate academics on the factors
affecting their work performance.” University of Kwazulu-Natal,
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11892/79079
55. Huff,
K.C. (2013), "Language, cultural intelligence and expatriate
success", Management Research Review, Vol. 36 (6), 596-612.
56. Hutchings
K, Cieri, H.D., and McNulty, Y., (2009), “Do global firms measure expatriate
return on investment? An empirical examination of measures, barriers and
variables influencing global staffing practices”. The International Journal of
Human Resource Management. 20 (6), 1309–1326.
57. Hutchings,
K., French, E. and Hatcher, T. (2008), "Lament of the ignored
expatriate", Equal Opportunities International, Vol. 27 (4),
372-391.
58. Iles,
P. (1995). “International HRM”. In: Mabey, C. and Salaman, G., eds, Strategic
Human Resource Management. Oxford: Blackwell.
59. Kelly,
P. Weeks, M. Weeks, K. and Muller, W. (2009), “The adjustment of expatriate
teenagers”, Personnel Review, Vol. 39 (1), 24.
60. Koteswari, V.B. and
Bhattacharya, M.S. (2007), “Managing expatriate stress”, Delhi Business
Review, Vol. 8 (1), 89-98.
61. Kothari,
C.R. (2004), “Research methodology methods and techniques”, 2nd dition, New
Delhi: New Age International Publisher, 2-8.
62. Kraimer,
M.L. and Wayne, S.J. (2004), “An examination of perceived organizational
support as a multidimensional construct in the context of expatriate
assignment”. Journal of Management, Vol. 30 (2), 209-237.
63. Laurent,
A. (1986), “The cross-cultural puzzle of international human resource
management”, Human Resource Management, Vol. 25 (1), 91-102.
64. Lee,
L.Y., Veasna, S. and Wu, W.Y. (2013), “The effects of social support and
transformational leadership on expatriate adjustment and performance", Career
Development International, Vol. 18 (4), 377–415.
65. Littrell,
L.N. and Salas, E. (2005), “A review of cross-cultural training: Best
practices, guidelines, and research needs”, Human Resource Development Review,
4, 305. DOI: 10.1177/1534484305278348
66. Liu, C.H. and Lee, H.W.,
(2008), "A proposed model of expatriates in multinational
corporations", Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal”,
Vol. 15 (2), 176–193.
67. Mahajan,
A. (2011), “Host country national’s reactions to expatriate pay policies:
making a case for a cultural alignment pay model”, The International Journal
of Human Resource Management. Vol. 22 (1), 121–137.
68. Mäkelä,
L., Känsälä, M. and Suutari, V. (2011), "The roles of expatriates' spouses
among dual career couples", Cross Cultural Management: An International
Journal, Vol. 18 (2), 185-197.
69.
Martin, S. and Doris, W. (2011),
"Expatriate compensation packages: What do employees prefer?", Cross
Cultural Management: An International Journal, Vol. 18 (2), 236–256.
70. McKenna,
S. (2010), “Adjustment of the independent expatriate – A case study of Doug”, Qualitative
Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal. Vol. 5
(3), 280–298.
“Expatriate satisfaction in
international assignments: Perspectives from Indian IT professionals working in
the US”, International Journal of Human Resource
Studies,
Vol. 2 (3),
72. Naumann,
E. (1993), “Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment among
expatriate managers”, Group and organization Management, Vol. 18 (2).
73. Naumann,
E. (1993), “Organizational predictors of expatriate job satisfaction”, Journal
of International Business Studies, Vol. 24 (1), 61-80.
74. Nery-Kjerfve,
T. and McLean, G.N. (2012), "Repatriation of expatriate employees,
knowledge transfer, and organizational learning", European Journal of
Training and Development, Vol. 36 (6), 614-629.
75. Paik, Y., Parboteeah,
K.P. and Shim, W. (2007), “The relationship between perceived compensation,
organizational commitment and job satisfaction: The case of Mexican workers in
the Korean Maquiladoras,” The International Journal of Human Resource
Management, Vol.18 (10), 1768–1781.
76. Pattie,
M., White, M.M. and Tansky, J. (2010), "The homecoming: A review of
support practices for repatriates", Career Development International,
Vol. 15(4), 359–377.
77. Paul,
A.K., and Anantharaman, R.N. (2002), “Business strategy, HRM practices and organizational
performance: A study of the Indian software industry”, Journal of Transactional Management Development,
Vol. 7(3), 27-51.
78. Peltokorpi,
V. (2011), “Performance-related reward systems (PRRS) in Japan: Practices and
preferences in Nordic subsidiaries,” The International Journal of Human
Resource Management, Vol. 22(12), 2507–2521, ISSN 0958-5192.
79. Peltonen,
T. (1998), “Narrative construction of expatriate experience and career
cycle: Discursive patterns in Finnish stories of international career, The
International Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 9 (5), 875-892.
80. Pennings,
J.M. (1993). “Executive reward systems: A Cross-national comparison”, Journal
of Management Studies. Vol. 30 (2), 261-280.
81. Peppas, S.C. (2004),
“Making the most of international assignments: A training model for non-resident
expatriates”, Journal of American Academy of Business. Vol. 5 (1/2),
41-46.
82. Qin,
C. and Baruch, Y. (2010), "The impact of cross-cultural training for
expatriates in a Chinese firm", Career Development International,
Vol. 15 (3), 296–318.
83. Redman,
L.V. and Mory, A.V.H. (1923), “The Romance of Research”, 10.
84. Reynolds,
C. (1997), “Expatriate compensation in historical perspective”, Journal of
World Business, Vol. 32 (2), 118-132.
85. Schneider,
M. and Doris, W. (2011), “Expatriate compensation packages: What do employees
prefer?” Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal. Vol. 18
(2), 236–256.
86. Schneider,
S. and Tung, R. (2001), “Introduction to the international human resource
management”, Journal of World Business. Vol. 36 (4), 341.
87. Schoepp,
K. and Forstenlechner, I. (2010), "The role of family considerations in an
expatriate majority environment", Team Performance Management: An
International Journal, Vol. 16 (5/6), 309-323.
88. Schraeder, M. and Sims,
R.H. (2005). “Expatriate compensation: An exploratory review of salient
contextual factors and common practices”, Career Development International.
Vol. 10 (2), 98–108.
89. Schuler,
R.S., Budhwar, P.S. and Florkowski, G.W. (2002), “International human resource
management: Review and critique”. International Journal of Management
Reviews. Vol. 4 (1), 41–70.
90. Schuler,
R.S., and Jackson, S.E. (2005), “A quarter-century review of human resource
management in the U.S.: The growth in importance of the international
perspective”, Management Revue, Vol. 16 (1), 1-25.
91. Schuler,
R.S., Jackson, S. and Luo, Y., (2004), “Managing human resources in
cross-border alliance, London: Routledge.
92. Scullion,
H. (1994). “Staffing policies and strategic control in British multinationals”,
International Studies of Management and Organization, Vol. 24 (3),
18–35.
93. Scullion,
H. and Starkey, K. (2000), “The changing role of the corporate human resource
function in the international firm” International Journal of Human Resource
Management, Vol. 11 (6), 1061–81.
94. Selmer,
J. (2002), “Practice makes perfect? International experience and expatriate
adjustment”, Management International Review, Vol. 42 (1), 71-88.
95. Selmer,
J. (2004). “Psychological barriers to adjustment of western business
expatriates in China: Newcomers vs long stayers”. International Journal of
Human Resource Management. Vol. 15 (4), 794-813.
96. Selmer, J. and Fenner,
C.R. (2009), "Spillover effects between work and non‐work adjustment among
public sector expatriates", Personnel Review, Vol. 38 (4), 366-379.
97. Selmer,
J. and Lauring, J. (2011), "Expatriate academics: Job factors and
work outcomes", International Journal of Manpower, Vol. 32 (2),
194-210.
98. Selmer,
J and Lauring, J. (2012), “Reasons to expatriate and work outcomes of
self-initiated expatriates”, Personnel Review, Vol. 41 (5), 665–684.
99. Shaffer,
M.A., Kraimer, M.L., Chen, Y.P. and Bolino, M.C. (2012), “Choices, challenges,
and career consequences of global work experiences: A review and future agenda.
Journal of Management, Vol. 38, 1282-1327.
100.Sharma, V. and Matta,
M.G. (2016), “A Study of IHRM Practices Affecting Expatriate Satisfaction in IT
Sector”, Indian
Journal of Applied Research “ Volume : 6 (12) pp.789-795,ISSN -
2249-555X
101.Shen, Y. and Kram, K.E. (2011),
“Expatriates' developmental networks: Network diversity, base and support
functions", Career Development International, Vol. 16 (6), 528-552.
102.Shortland, S. (2009),
“Gender diversity in expatriation: Evaluating theoretical perspectives”, Gender
in Management: An International Journal, Vol. 24 (5), 365–386.
103.Srivastava, D.K. and
Panday, M. (2012), "Dimensions of Indian expatriate adjustment in the USA:
An exploratory study", Competitiveness Review: An International
Business Journal, Vol. 22 (4), 320–328.
104.Suutari, V., and Burch,
D. (2001), “The role of onsite training and support in expatriation: Existing
and necessary host company practices”, Career Development International.
Vol. 6 (6), 298-312.
105.Suutari, V. and
Tornikoski, C. (2000), “Determinants of expatriate compensation– Findings among
expatriate members of SEFE”, Finnish Journal of Business Economics, Vol. 4,
517–539.
106.Stone, R.J. (Ed.).
(2002). “Human Resource Management”, 4th ed. Milton, QLD: John Willey
and Sons., 4.
107.Takeuchi, R., Yun, S.
and Tesluk, P.E. (2002), “An examination of crossover and spillover effects of
spousal and expatriate cross-cultural adjustment on expatriate outcomes”, Journal
of Applied Psychology, Vol 87 (4), 655-666.
108.Tania, N.K. and McLean,
G.N. (2012), “Repatriation of expatriate employees, knowledge transfer and
organizational learning”, European Journal of Training and Development. Vol.
36 (6), 614–629..
109.Taylor, S., Beechler,
S., Napier, N. (1996), “Towards an integrative model of strategic international
human resource management”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21
(4), 959–85.
110.Tornikoski, C. (2011),
"Fostering expatriate affective commitment: A total reward
perspective", Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal,
Vol. 18 (2), 214–235.
111.Tornikoski, C.
(2012), “Expatriate
compensation: A total reward perspective”, Emlyon Business School, 1-205.
112.Townsend, P.,
Regan, P. and Li, L.L. (2015), “Developing international managers: The
contribution of cultural experience to learning", International Journal
of Educational Management, Vol. 29 (2), 234–251.
113.Tseng, H.C.,
Chou, L.Y. and Yu, K.H. (2010), “Current research paradigms in expatriate
research: A bibliometric approach”, The International Journal of
Organizational Innovation, Vol. 2 (3), 22.
114.Upadhya, C.
(2007), “Employment, exclusion and 'merit' in the Indian IT industry”, Economic
and Political Weekly, Vol. 42 (20), 1863-1868.
115.Upadhya, C.
(2009), “Controlling offshore knowledge workers: Power and agency in India's
software outsourcing industry”, Journal of New Technology Work and Employment, Vol. 24 (1), 2–18.
116.Upadhya,
C. and Vasavi, A.R. (2006); Work,
culture and sociality in the Indian information technology (IT) industry: A
sociological study. Project Report. National Institute
of Advanced Studies, Bangalore, 1-185.
117.Valk, R., Velde,
M. and Szkudlarek, B. (2013), “International assignment and repatriation
experiences of Indian international assignees in The Netherlands", International
Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 21 (3), 335-356.
118.Valk, R., Velde,
M. Engen, M. and Godbole, R. (2014), “International career motives,
repatriation and career success of Indian women in Science and
Technology", Journal of Global Mobility, Vol. 2 (2),
203-233.
119.Varma, A., Soo,
M.T. and Budhwar, P. (2006), “A new perspective on the female expatriate
experience: The role of host country national categorization”. Journal of
World Business. Vol. 41 (2), 112-120.
120.Welch, D.
(1994), “Determinants of international human resource management approaches and
activities: A suggested framework”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol.
31 (2), 139–64.
121.Yaping, C.
(2003), “Subsidiary staffing in multinational enterprises: Agency, resource,
and performance”. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 46 (6), 728–739.
122.Za´rraga-Obertyc,
C., Sanchezb, J.I. and Bonachea, J. (2009), “The interaction of expatriate pay
differential and expatriate inputs on host country nationals’ pay unfairness”, The
International Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 20 (10),
2135–2149.
123.Zulima, F. and
Bonache, J. (1997). “Expatriate compensation and its link to the subsidiary
strategic role: A theoretical analysis”, The International Journal of Human
Resource Management. Vol. 8 (4), 457-475.
124.The Abridged Job
Descriptive Index BGSU (Bowling Green State University) 1975-2009
https://webapp.bgsu.edu/jdi/ accessed on December 2014.
125.http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/spss/output/factor1.htm
accessed
on 25/08/2016
126.http://blog.minitab.com/blog/adventures-in-statistics/how-to-interpret-regression-analysis-results-p-values-and-coefficients
accessed
on 26/08/2016
127.https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat501/node/281 accessed
on 11/09/2016
128.https://statistics.laerd.com/spss-tutorials/independent-t-test-using-spss-statistics.php
accessed
on 13/10/2016
129.http://bloghresources.blogspot.com/2010/02/pre-departure-orientation-and-training.html
accessed
on 02/11/2016
130.https://drsharongalor.wordpress.com/2015/09/14/social-support-is-indispensable-to-the-psychological-adjustment-of-expats/ accessed
on 02/11/2016
131.http://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-economy-gdp-idUSKCN0UU0EU
accessed
on 01/09/2016
132.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_India
accessed on 06/09/2016
133.http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/data-analysis.html
accessed
on 06/09/2016
134.https://www.comptia.org/resources/it-industry-outlook-2016-finalaccessed on
5th September 2016 at 11am
135.http://www.statista.com/statistics/328203/indian-software-market-revenue/accessed
on 6th September 2016 10 am.
136.http://lexicon.ft.com/Term?term=expatriateaccessed
on 5th September 2016 at 11am
137.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expatriateaccessed
on 5th September 2016 at 11am
138.http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Em-Exp/Expatriates.html#ixzz4JLsPyivgaccessed
on 5th September 2016 at 11am
139.http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Em-Exp/Expatriates.htmlaccessed
on 5th September 2016 at 11am
140.http://www.ibef.org/industry/information-technology-india.aspx
accessed on 25 December 2016
141.http://www.uva.fi/materiaali/pdf/isbn_978-952-476-342-4.pdf
accessed on 27 December 2016
142.http://research-methodology.net/sampling-in-primary-data-collection/purposive-sampling/accessed on 27
dec2016
143.http://old.staff.neu.edu.tr/~rserdaroglu/files/MR%20CHPTERLER/MR%2014%20SESSION%2010%20[Compatibility%20Mode].pdf
downloaded on 14 December 2016
144.http://www.nasscom.in/robust-growth-indian-itbpm-industry accessed on
28dec 2016
145.http://www.nasscom.in/indian-itbpo-industryaccessed on 28
dec 2016
146.http://www.nasscom.in/global-sourcingaccessed on 28
dec 2016
147.http://www.nasscom.in/impact-indias-growthaccessed on 28
dec 2016
148.http://www.nasscom.in/knowledge-professionalsaccessed
on28 dec 2016
149.http://www.drjohnboudreau.com/wps/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/G16-02-669.pdf
accessed on 30 dec 2016
150.https://xisspm.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/chap-2-concept-of-ihrm.pdf
accessed on 30 dec 2016
Received on 31.05.2017
Modified on 11.08.2017
Accepted on 28.09.2017
© A&V
Publications All right reserved
Asian Journal of Management.
2018; 9(1):227-238.
DOI:
10.5958/2321-5763.2018.00035.5