Author(s):
Prasenjit Chakravarty, Debobani Biswas, Sanatanu Ray Chaudhuri
Email(s):
prasenjit28@rediffmail.com
DOI:
10.52711/2321-5763.2025.00040
Address:
Prasenjit Chakravarty, Debobani Biswas, Sanatanu Ray Chaudhuri
1Research Scholar, The Neotia University and Assistant Professor, Amity University, Kolkata.
2The Neotia University, Kolkata.
3Brainware University, Kolkata.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 16,
Issue - 4,
Year - 2025
ABSTRACT:
Schultz's human capital theory suggests that education is an investment in human capital, contributing to economic growth and social, economic, and scientific development. Higher education equips individuals with skills for employment and enhances productivity and earnings. It’s growth in recent years is notable, with the World Bank stating that every additional year of education increases a country's GDP by 0.37%. In India, higher education is recognized as a key driver of economic growth, contributing 4-5% to the country's GDP. It also promotes women's empowerment, self-esteem, and cultural awareness. The study aims to understand the concept of efficiency in higher education, its measurement, comparison with effectiveness, and future research directions. Efficiency in higher education is influenced by various variables, including individual benefits, process measurements, performance comparisons, economic value, competency alignment with job markets, value for money, Pareto criteria, cost variations, and a balance of economic and social efficiency. Metrics for efficiency in higher education include publications, research grants, and graduates' competencies. The study also explores the relationship between efficiency and effectiveness in higher education. The study finds that efficiency in higher education focuses on how optimally inputs and educational resources can be used to produce outputs which are related to individual performance measures. On the other hand, the no less significant idea of effectiveness in higher education is best understood by looking at the extent to which desired outcomes and goals are achieved, which are, of course, student-centric. Further research needs to be taken up to ascertain the roles and responsibilities of other stakeholders in the domain of higher education, namely, the parents and socio-political institutions as these may well influence educational outcomes.
Cite this article:
Prasenjit Chakravarty, Debobani Biswas, Sanatanu Ray Chaudhuri. Mapping the Landscape of Higher Education: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Asian Journal of Management. 2025;16(4):272-8. doi: 10.52711/2321-5763.2025.00040
Cite(Electronic):
Prasenjit Chakravarty, Debobani Biswas, Sanatanu Ray Chaudhuri. Mapping the Landscape of Higher Education: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Asian Journal of Management. 2025;16(4):272-8. doi: 10.52711/2321-5763.2025.00040 Available on: https://ajmjournal.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2025-16-4-2
REFERENCES:
1. Schultz TW. Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review. 1961 Mar 1; 51(1):1-7.
2. Duraisamy P. Changes in returns to education in India, 1983–94: By gender, age-cohort and location. Economics of Education Review. 2002 Dec 1; 21(6):609-22.
3. Psacharopoulos G, Patrinos HA. Returns to investment in education: a decennial review of the global literature. Education Economics. 2018 Sep 3; 26(5):445-58.
4. OECD (2015), Education at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2015-en.
5. Carnevale AP, Jayasundera T, Gulish A. Good jobs are back. Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://cew. georgetown. edu/wp-content/uploads/Good-Jobs_Full_Final. pdf. 2015.
6. FICCI. FICCI Report on Higher Education. New Delhi: Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry; 2020.
7. Buchmann C, DiPrete TA. The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review. 2006 Aug; 71(4):515-41.
8. Kumar S, editor. Youth in India: Aspirations, attitudes, anxieties. Taylor & Francis; 2019 Mar 26.
9. National Council of Applied Economic Research. Annual Report 2018–19. New Delhi: National Council of Applied Economic Research; 2019. 122 p. Available from: www.ncaer.org.
10. Pascarella ET, Terenzini PT. How College Affects Students: A Third Decade of Research. Volume 2. Jossey-Bass, An Imprint of Wiley. 10475 Crosspoint Blvd, Indianapolis, IN 46256; 2005 Feb.
11. Simmons J, Alexander L. The determinants of school achievement in developing countries: A review of the research. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 1978 Jan 1; 26(2):341-57.
12. Cowan J. Effectiveness and efficiency in higher education. Higher Education. 1985 Jun; 14(3):235-9.
13. Parshakov P, Shakina EA. With or without CU: A comparative study of efficiency of European and Russian corporate universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 2018 Jan 8; 19(1):96-111.
14. Welch AR. The cult of efficiency in education: Comparative reflections on the reality and the rhetoric. Comparative Education. 1998 Jun 1; 34(2):157-75.
15. Sneha Bhasin. Input Output in Education. Res. J. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2019; 10(1): 91-96.
16. Joumady O, Ris C. Performance in European higher education: A non‐parametric production frontier approach. Education Economics. 2005 Jun 1; 13(2):189-205.
17. Bevc M, Uršič S. Relations between funding, equity, and efficiency of higher education. Education Economics. 2008 Sep 1; 16(3):229-44.
18. Kosor MM. Efficiency measurement in higher education: Concepts, methods and perspective. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013 Dec 10; 106:1031-8.
19. Johnes G. Evaluating the efficiency of public services. IZA World of Labor. 2015.
20. Li-min Y. On the efficiency of higher education. Univ Educ Sci. 2006.
21. Klumpp M. Efficiency in higher education: Requirements, theory, methods and decision areas. In Theory and Method in Higher Education Research 2015 Sep 29 (pp. 93-118). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
22. Gralka S, Wohlrabe K, Bornmann L. How to measure research efficiency in higher education? Research grants vs. publication output. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2019 May 4; 41(3):322-41.
23. Zhou P, Leydesdorff L. Research collaboration in higher education: a bibliometric analysis. PLoS One. 2019 Oct; 14(10):e0223057. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223057.
24. Johnes J. Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Economics of Education Review. 2006 Jun 1; 25(3):273-88.
25. Ferro G, D'Elia V. Higher education efficiency frontier analysis: a review of variables to consider. 2020; 13:140-53
26. D'Elia VV, Ferro G. Empirical efficiency measurement in higher education: An overview. Serie Documentos de Trabajo, Nro. 2019 Dec 1; 708.
27. Eckles JE. Evaluating the efficiency of top liberal arts colleges. Research in Higher Education. 2010 May; 51(3):266-93.
28. Kumar A, Thakur RR. Objectivity in performance ranking of higher education institutions using dynamic data envelopment analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2019 Jun 10; 68(4):774-96.
29. Mikušová P. The efficiency of public higher education institutions: a meta-analysis. Ekonomický Časopis. 2020; 68(09):963-77.
30. Changjun Y. An empirical study on efficiency of recruitment of college graduates. J High Educ. 2008.
31. Mainardes E, Alves H, Raposo M. Using expectations and satisfaction to measure the frontiers of efficiency in public universities. Tertiary Education and Management. 2014 Dec; 20:339-53.
32. Johnes G. Efficiency in English higher education institutions revisited: A network approach. Economics Bulletin. 2013; 33(4):2698-706.
33. De Witte K, Hudrlikova L. What about excellence in teaching? A benevolent ranking of universities. Scientometrics. 2013 Jul; 96(1):337-64.
34. Pingle Shubhangi G., Lahiri Moon Moon, Jain Nanda S.. Applying ‘Total Quality Management’ Concept in Academics in context to higher educational system in rural region Case Study of Shirpur Taluka, Dist. Dhule (M.S.) India. Asian J. Management. 2012; 3(3): 134-138.
35. Arhipova I, Paura L, Eiduks J, Vitols G. Comparative analysis of higher education study programs’ quality, efficiency and effectiveness. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Advances, 2017 Jun 26 (pp. 55-63). Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València.
36. Ryabchenko V. Developing the Personal Potential of Academic Staff and Higher Education Applicants as an Integrated Criterion for the Performance and Effectiveness of University Management. International Scientific Journal of Universities and Leadership. 2019 Oct 21(7): 65-88.
37. Levchenko S. Efficiency and effectiveness in a context of a higher education institutions: classification and problems of definition. International Humanitarian University Herald. Economics and Management. 2021.
38. Hanson GR, Swann DM. Using multiple program impact analysis to document institutional effectiveness. Research in Higher Education. 1993 Feb 1; 34(1):71-94.
39. Goldschmid ML. The evaluation and improvement of teaching in higher education. Higher education. 1978 May; 7(2):221-45.
40. Martini MC, Fabbris L. Beyond employment rate: A multidimensional indicator of higher education effectiveness. Social Indicators Research. 2017 Jan; 1(30):351-70.
41. d'Apollonia S, Abrami PC. Navigating student ratings of instruction. American Psychologist. 1997 Nov; 52(11):1198.
42. Horn AS, Horner OG, Lee G. Measuring the effectiveness of two-year colleges: a comparison of raw and value- added performance indicators. Studies in Higher Education. 2019 Jan 2; 44(1):151-69.
43. Tinto V. From theory to action: exploring the institutional change required for improving student success. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. 2017; 32:1-39.
44. Manoj Kumar Kowar. Enhancing Teachers’ Efficiency in Technical Education through MBO. Asian J. Management. 2011; 2(2): 57-62.
45. Charu Sarin. Analyzing Skill Gap between Higher Education and Employability. Res. J. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2019; 10(3): 941-948. doi: 10.5958/2321-5828.2019.00154.2
46. McFarland J, Hussar B, Wang X, Zhang J, Wang K, Rathbun A, Barmer A, Cataldi EF, Mann FB. The Condition of Education 2018. NCES 2018-144. National Center for Education Statistics. 2018 May.
47. Worthington AC. An empirical survey of frontier efficiency measurement techniques in education. Education Economics. 2001 Dec 1; 9(3): 245-68.
48. Biraimah K. Marketization of higher education: a review of the literature. International Journal of Education and Research. 2020; 8(1):23-34.
49. Altbach PG. The complex roles of government in higher education. In: Altbach PG, editor. The international encyclopedia of higher education systems and institutions. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2016. p. 1-10.
50. Carnoy M, Rabling B. The political economy of higher education finance: the politics of tuition fees and subsidies in OECD countries, 1945-2015. Teachers College Record. 2012; 114(8): 1-31.
51. Kuber Singh Gurupanch. Recent trends, Challenges and Issues in Social Science. International Journal of Reviews and Research in Social Sciences. 2023; 11(3): 163-7. doi: 10.52711/2454-2687.2023.00026
52. Neetu Antil. Professional Development of Teachers in Higher Education. Research J. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2017; 8(3): 311-315. doi: 10.5958/2230-7311.2017.00021.6
53. Shaheen Fatima Khan. Higher Education: Innovation and Practices. Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2024; 15(2): 161-166. doi: 10.52711/2321-5828.2024.00024
54. Rameshkumar K. Ravaliya. Higher Education in India: Sociological Overviews. International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences. 2023; 11(2): 127-0. doi: 10.52711/2454-2679.2023.00019
55. Poonam Juneja, Prajwalit Shikha. Role of Infrastructure in Improving Students’ Outcomes. Res. J. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2019; 10(3): 918-924. doi: 10.5958/2321-5828.2019.00151.7
56. Chapman D. Social justice and the university curriculum: a case study of a social justice-focused curriculum initiative. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 2017; 39(5): 525-39.
57. Mok KH, Han X, Jiang J, Zhang X. International and transnational education for whose interests? A study on the career development of Chinese students. Higher Education Quarterly. 2018 Jul; 72(3): 208-23.
58. Marginson S. The impossibility of capitalist markets in higher education. Journal of Education Policy. 2013 May 1; 28(3):353-70.
59. Bok D. Higher education in America. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 2015.
60. De Neve JE, Kawachi I. Political instability and human capital accumulation. World Dev. 2017; 94: 156-67. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.005.
61. Rattan Lal. Higher Education in India: Emerging Issues and Challenges. Res. J. Humanities and Social Sciences. 2019; 10(2): 672-676. doi: 10.5958/2321-5828.2019.00110.4.