ISSN

2321-5763 (Online)
0976-495X (Print)


Author(s): Pius Kwame Agyekum, K. M. Sharath Kumar, Stephen Asunka

Email(s): pagyekum@gtuc.edu.gh , agyekumpius@yahoo.co.uk

DOI: 10.5958/2321-5763.2020.00058.X   

Address: Pius Kwame Agyekum1*, K. M. Sharath Kumar2, Stephen Asunka3
1Ph.D. Scholar, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka.
2Director – Research, M.S. Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka.
3Head-ITSS, Ghana Technology University College, Tesano, Accra.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 11,      Issue - 4,     Year - 2020


ABSTRACT:
This research article looks at the personality traits that impart Entrepreneurial Intentions (EI) among students and faculty members in selected Universities of Ghana. The study broadly considers how personality traits and behavior, personality model, parent background and demographic factors impact EI through knowledge and skill acquisition in a University environment. Four major hypothesis listed below were considered for the analysis: 1. H0: Personality traits impact students and faculty members with EI through knowledge and skills acquisition 2. H0: Big Five Personality Model impacts EI 3. H0: Education and occupational background of parents impact EI of students and faculty 4. H0: Personality traits, personality model and parent background impact EI and subsequently moderated by demographic background (Ethnicity, Age, Sex) of students and faculty members. A total of 800 students were strategically drawn from seven private and public Universities in Ghana to participate in the research. But 584 questionnaires constituting 71 % response rate were eventually received and used for the analysis. Online or electronic method of data collection was initially employed but had to be changed after two weeks for the traditional face-to-face interviews with questionnaires for faster and better results. A mixture of purposive, accidental, convenience and quota sampling techniques were employed in the data collection. SPSS and PLS-SEM 3 software were used to analyze the data. The Cronbach Alpha value of 0.896 was obtained on 12-demographic data items to ensure validity and internal consistency of the data. The Cronbach Alpha value signified that the data was highly consistent, reliable, thus, can be validated. Results confirmed personality trait/behaviour impact positively on EI of students and faculty members. The Big Five personality model involving Extraversion, Openness, Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness relatively impact EI of students and faculty members. Further, the parent background negatively impacted on EI which is contrary to what most literature confirm. A unit change in parent background can reduce impact on EI by 0.03 units. On the other hand, Need for Achievement (NA), Locus of Control (LC), Subjective Norm (SN), Risk Taking (RT) positively impacted EI. Attitude (ATT) of students and faculty members showed negative relationship (-0.08) among the personality traits with a non-significant p-value of 0.790, disapproving what some literature and theories affirm. Lastly, the demographic background of students and faculty members with knowledge and skills acquisition impacted EI positively in parallel.


Cite this article:
Pius Kwame Agyekum, K. M. Sharath Kumar, Stephen Asunka. Assessment of the Traits which transform the Orientation of students and faculty members that impact their Entrepreneurial intentions. Asian Journal of Management. 2020;11(4):379-388. doi: 10.5958/2321-5763.2020.00058.X


REFERENCES:
1.    Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M., (1997) Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Theoretical Analysis and Review of Empirical Research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(05), pp. 888-918.
2.    Ajzen, I., (1987) Attitudes, Traits and Actions: Dispositional Prediction of Behavior in Personality and Social Psychology. Advances in Experimental Social Psychological, 20(01), pp. 01-63.
3.    Ajzen, I., (1991) The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(02), pp. 179-211.
4.    Alexandrina, M. P, Onise A. Tudor. E and Rodica M. Zaharia (2018). What Determinants Influence Students to Start Their Own Business? Empirical Evidence from United Arab Emirates Universities. Sustainability 2019, 11, 92; doi: 10.3390/su11010092 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability
5.    Bandura, A. (1997), Self –Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, W.H. Freeman.
6.    Bird, B. J., (1988) Implementing Entrepreneurial Ideas: The Case for Intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(01) pp. 442-453.
7.    Brandstatter, H., (2003) Personality Aspects of Entrepreneurship: A Look at Five Meta-Analyses. Personality and Individual Differences.
8.    Crant (1996) The Proactive Personality Scale as a Predictor of Entrepreneurial Intentions’. J. of small Business Management 34(03), pp. 42-49.
9.    Davidson (1915b) Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intentions. Presented at the Rent IX Workshop, Piecenza, Italy.
10.    Elfving, J., Brannback, M., and Carsrud, A., (2009) Toward a Contextual Model of Entrepreneurial Intentions. In. Carsrud A. L, and Brannback M., (Eds). Understanding the Entrepreneurial Mind, Opening the Black Box. New York: Springer, pp. 23-33.
11.    Ethier, R.G, Poe G.L., Schulze W.D. and Clark J. (2000). A Comparison of Hypothetical Phone and Mail Contingent Valuation Responses for Green-Pricing Electricity Programmes. Land Econ., 76(01), pp. 54-67.
12.    Fayolle, A., Gailly, B., and Lassas-Clerc, N., (2006) Assessing the Impact of Entrepreneurship Education Programmes: A New Methodology. J. of European Industrial Training, 30(09), pp. NA.
13.    Khadeeja, A.S.T., Sayang, N.R, and Idris, M.N.., (2017). The factors affecting the entrepreneurial intentions of University students in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Technopreneurship Volume 7, No. 2, June 2017 [189-202]
14.    Kolvereid, L. (1996) Organizational Employment versus Self-Employment: Reasons for Career Choice Intentions’. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 21(3) 23-31.
15.    Krueger, N. F. Jr, and Dickson, P., (1993) Perceived Self-Efficacy and Perceptions of Opportunity and Threat. Psychological Reports, 73(03), pp. 1235-1240.
16.    Krueger, N. F, Jr, and Brazeal, D.V., (1994) Entrepreneurship Potential and Potential Entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(03), pp. 91-104.
17.    Lee, L, Wong, P. K, Foo, M. D., and Leung, A., (2011) Entrepreneurial Intentions: The Influence of Organizational and Individual Factors. J. of Business Venturing, 26(01), pp. 124-136.
18.    Lee, S. H., and Wong, P. K., (2004) An Exploratory Study of Technopreneurial Intentions: A Career Anchor Perspective. J. of Business Venturing, 19(01), PP. NA
19.    Luthje, C., and Franke, N., (2003) The “Making” of an Entrepreneur: Testing a Model of the “Making” of an Entrepreneur: of R&D Management.
20.    Man, T. W. Y., (2000) Entrepreneurial Competence of SME Owner/Managers in the Hong Kong Services Sector, a Qualitative Analysis. J. of Enterprising Culture, 08(03), pp. 235-254.
21.    Mattews, C., and Moser, S., (1995) Family Background and Gender: Implications for Interest in Small Firm Ownership. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 07(01), pp. 365-377.
22.    McClelland, D. C., (1961) The Achieving Society. New York
23.    Migliore, A. (2011) Relationship between Big Five Personality Traits and Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions, a Sample from India and USA. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 18(01), pp. NA.
24.    Perera, Q., (2012) Local Universities Producing Less than 5% of SL’s Entrepreneurs. Retrieved December 25, 2012, from Sunday Times: http:/www.sundaytimes.ik/120506/BusinessTimes/ bt16.html.
25.    Ranwala R.S. and Dissanayake D.M.N.S. (2016) Social and Basic Science Research Reviews. Volume 4 ISSN: 2313-6758
26.    Shapero, A., and Sokole, L., (1982) The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship. In C.A. Kent, D.L. Sexton, and K.H. Vesper (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp.72-90.
27.    Shaver, K. G., (1995) The Entrepreneurial Personality Myth. Business and Economic Review, 41(03), pp.20-23.
28.    Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S., (2001) Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
29.    Usman and Yennita (2019). Understanding the entrepreneurial intention among international students in Turkey. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s40497-018-0136-0
30.    Van Gelderen, M., Brand, M., Van Praag, M., Bodewes, W., Poutsma, E., and Van Gils, A., (2008) Explaining Entrepreneurial Intentions by Means of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Career Development International, 13(06), pp. 538-559.
31.    Zhao, H. S., Seibert, S. E., and Hills, G. E., (2005) The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy in the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions. J. of Applied Psychology, 90(01), pp. 189-202.
32.    Zhao, H., and Seibert, S. E., (2006) The Big Five Personality Dimensions and Entrepreneurial Status: A Meta-Analytical Review. J. of Applied Psychology, pp. 256-289.

Recomonded Articles:

Author(s): Yosef Latifi, Fariba Azizzadeh, Samira Azizzadeh

DOI: 10.5958/2321-5763.2016.00024.X         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Shaeril Michael Almeida, Arson Jokim D’Souza, Tenzin Dolma

DOI: 10.5958/2321-5763.2018.00087.2         Access: Open Access Read More

Author(s): Bharati Verma

DOI:         Access: Open Access Read More

Asian Journal of Management (AJM) is an international, peer-reviewed journal, devoted to managerial sciences. The aim of AJM is to publish the relevant to applied management theory and practice...... Read more >>>

RNI: Not Available                     
DOI: 10.5958/2321-5763 


Recent Articles




Tags