Author(s):
Hitesh Choudhary
Email(s):
hitesh_jat@yahoo.com , hjat51@gmail.com
DOI:
10.52711/2321-5763.2021.00021 
Address:
Dr. Hitesh Choudhary
College of Nursing, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gate No 5, AIIMS Campus, Great Eastern Road, Tatibandh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492099.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 12,
Issue - 2,
Year - 2021
ABSTRACT:
Introduction and Background: Introduction of the triple mantra, Liberalization, Privatization and Globalization (LPG) in Indian Economy towards the beginning of 1990’s attracted many Multi-National Companies to Indian Consumer market. This new entry of MNC’s coupled with the struggle of traditional Indian corporate to survive in the market resulted in increased volume of advertisements and now the media are flooded with the advertisements of competing brands. Objectives: 1. To compare the level of Communication-Effect in terms of Advertising Effectiveness, among highly Creative advertising and Conventional Advertising. 2. To see the differences in Communication-Effect in terms of fulfilling Communication Objectives, in two groups of advertising. 3. To measure and compare the Attitude towards Advertisements generated by the two types of advertisements. Methods: The study reported here embodies a quantitative perspective and the type of research was designated as diagnostic research. The research method used to collect data was Sample Survey method. The sample size was determined as 200 and Multi-Stage Stratified Random Sampling method was resorted to as the sampling procedure. The research participants consisted of women, aged 18 to 49. Results: Among The Five Most Liked Ads by consumers, without any form of aid, Liril Toilet Soap’s commercial showing the fantasy of a dancing girl under waterfall gets the highest liking position. Other most liked ads are the commercials of Santhoor soap, Kanan Devan Tea, Close-up paste and Rasna soft drink. Highly Creative advertising has more Communication Effect in terms of Advertising Effectiveness when compared to Conventional advertising. Firstly, Highly Creative group gets higher level of Recall measured by both Brand and Ad Recall. Highly Creative advertising has significantly more Communication Effect in terms of other measures of Advertising Effectiveness. It has more Interest or Cognitive Affect (ICA), more Information value, lower Irritation level and higher positive Attitude towards Ads.
Cite this article:
Hitesh Choudhary. Creativity in Advertising: Impact on Communication-effect and Consumer purchase behaviour. Asian Journal of Management. 2021; 12(2):144-6. doi: 10.52711/2321-5763.2021.00021
Cite(Electronic):
Hitesh Choudhary. Creativity in Advertising: Impact on Communication-effect and Consumer purchase behaviour. Asian Journal of Management. 2021; 12(2):144-6. doi: 10.52711/2321-5763.2021.00021 Available on: https://ajmjournal.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2021-12-2-8
REFERENCES:
1. “Cutting through ad clutter”. Credit Union management 15, 6, 1992: p.42
2. Aaker, David A; Myer, John G and Batra, Rajeev. Advertising Management. Prentice-Hall of India (Pvt) Ltd; 1997: p. 3
3. Aaker, David A. and Bruzzone, Donald E. “Viewer Perceptions of Prime-Time Television Advertising”. Journal of Advertising Research 21, 5, 1981: pp. 15-23
4. Aaker, David A, and John G. Myers; Advertising Management: 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1982
5. Aaker, David A, and Norris, Donald. “Characteristics of TV Commercials Perceived as Informative”. Journal of Advertising Research 22, 2, 1982: pp. 61-70
6. Adams, Anthony J. and Blair, Margaret Henderson. “Persuasive Advertising and Sales Accountability.” Journal of Advertising Research, April 1992: pp. 20-25
7. Agarwal, Deepak, “Effect of Brand Loyalty on Advertising and Trade Promotions: A Game Theoretic Analysis with Empirical Evidence”. Marketing Science 15, 1, 1996; pp 86-108
8. Alberstein, Neil M; and Peyrot, Mark. “Consumer Awareness of Prescription Drug Advertising”. Journal of Advertising Research 33, 4, 1993: pp. 50-56
9. Alpart, Mark I; Linda, Golden L. and Wayne D. Hoyer. “The Impact of Repetition on Advertising Effectiveness”. Advances in Consumer Research 10, 1983
10. Alwitt, Linda F. and Prabhaker, Paul R. “Functional and Belief Dimensions of Attitudes to TV Advertising: Implications for Copy testing”. Journal of Advertising Research, Sept/Oct 1992
11. Alwitt, Linda. “Components of Ad Likeability”. Paper presented at a symposium on the uses of Cognitive Psychology in Advertising and Marketing, May 4-5, 1987
12. Appelbaum, Ullrich and Halliburton, Chris. ‘How to Develop International advertising Campaigns that Work’. International Journal of Advertising 12, 3 (1993); pp. 223-241
13. Bagozzi, Richard P. and Alvin J. Silk, “Recall, Recognition, and the Measurement of Memory for Print Advertisements”. Marketing Science 2, 2, 1983; pp. 95-134
14. Barrow, Peter. “Advertising: Does it or Doesn’t it?”. Canadian Manager 18, 1, 1993; pp. 18-19
15. Beil, Alexander L.; “Do You Really Want to Know?”; Journal of Advertising Research 36, 2 (1996); p. RC2-RC7
16. Beil, Alexander L. and Carol A. Bridgwater, “Attributes of Liable Television Commercials”. Journal of Advertising Research, 30, 3, 1990; pp 38-44
17. Bell, Jack A. “Creativity, TV Commercial Popularity and Advertising Expenditures”. International Journal of Advertising 11, 2, 1992; pp. 165-172
18. Beltramini, Richard F. and Blasko, Vincent J. “An Analysis of Award-Winning Advertising Headlines”. Journal of Advertising Research, April/May 1986: pp. 48-51
19. Berlin, Andy, “A New Book Gathers up one of Advertising’s Most Influential yet least Honoured Figures”. Adweek 36, 21, 1995: p. 16
20. Bird, Drayton, “Creativity is not enough to shift a static market”. Marketing, 1995: p. 5
21. Brown, Gordon, “Tracking Studies and Sales Effects”. Journal of Advertising Research 25, 1, 1985; pp. 52-64
22. Burke, William L. and Sidney Schoeffler. “Brand Awareness as a Tool for Profitability”. The strategic Planning Institute, Boston; Cahners Publishing Company, 1980
23. Celsi, Richard L. and Jerry C. Olson. “The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes”. Journal of Consumer Research 15, 3, 1988: pp.210-224
24. Chamblee, Robert and Sandler, Dennis M. “Business-to-Business Advertising: Which Layout Style Works Best?” Journal of Advertising Research December 1992: pp.39-46