Author(s):
B. L. Gupta, Ajay Kumar Choubey
Email(s):
blgupta@nitttrbpl.ac.in
DOI:
10.52711/2321-5763.2021.00039 
Address:
B. L. Gupta1, Ajay Kumar Choubey2
1Professor, Department of Management Education, NITTTR, Bhopal, India.
2JRF, Department of Management Education, NITTTR, Bhopal, India.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 12,
Issue - 3,
Year - 2021
ABSTRACT:
Factors play a significant role in change management. In the context of national education policy 2020, it is envisaged that all the higher education institutions will be autonomous universities or autonomous colleges by 2035. In the current study factors affecting autonomy are explored at the institute, faculty, and student level. Researchers made instrument in Google form is used containing pre-identified facilitating and impeding factors to the sustenance of autonomy. These factors are identified based on the literature review and experiences of researchers. The facilitating and impending factors are prepared on a four-point Likert-type rating scale in Google form. The instrument is filled up by 752 respondents. The data were analyzed using a weighted mean. The reliability of the factors is calculated using Cronbach alpha. All the facilitating and impeding factors have been validated by respondents and it is found that all the factors have more than 60% and less than 75% influence. The institutes are suggested to measure the intensity of both the types of factors and design strategies for maximizing the use of facilitating factors and minimize the influence of the restraining forces for the sustenance of autonomy.
Cite this article:
B. L. Gupta, Ajay Kumar Choubey. Statistical Analysis of Facilitating and Impeding Factors for the Sustenance of Autonomy. Asian Journal of Management. 2021; 12(3):258-4. doi: 10.52711/2321-5763.2021.00039
Cite(Electronic):
B. L. Gupta, Ajay Kumar Choubey. Statistical Analysis of Facilitating and Impeding Factors for the Sustenance of Autonomy. Asian Journal of Management. 2021; 12(3):258-4. doi: 10.52711/2321-5763.2021.00039 Available on: https://ajmjournal.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2021-12-3-4
REFERENCES:
1. Kiran D. Devade, Sunil B. Ingole, Mahesh G. Bhong, Ramesh V. Kulkarni, (2013). “Structure of Autonomy in Technical Education: Proposition”, 43rd ISTE National Convention, pp. 1-7, 2013.
2. Amlendu Dubey, Amit Mehndiratta, Mahim Sagar, Smita Kashiramka, (2019). "Reforms in the technical education sector: evidence from World Bank-assisted Technical Education Quality Improvement Programme in India", Higher Education, Vol. 78, Issue 2, pp. 301–304, 2019.
3. Surendar K Rawat, Shruti Karkare, (2013) “Development of Technical Education in India”, 43rd ISTE National Convention, pp. 1-24, 2013.
4. Ved Prakash, (2005). "Report of the Central Advisory Board of Education (CABE) Committee on Autonomy of Higher Education Institutions", MHRD, pp. 1-136, 2005.
5. Priya Mathew, Prasanth Mathew, Prince, J. Peechattu, (2017). “Reflective Practices: A Means to Teacher Development”, Asia Pacific Institute of Advanced Research, Vol. 3, Issue 1, pp. 126 – 131, 2017.
6. Reehana Raza, (2009). “Examining Autonomy and Accountability in Public and Private Tertiary Institutions”, Human Development Network, The World Bank, pp. 1-36, 2009.
7. Leo van Lier, (2007). “Action-based Teaching, Autonomy and Identity”, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 46-65, 2007.
8. NEP (2020) National education policy – 2020, Ministry of education, Government of India.
9. NAAC (2012) Manual for autonomous colleges - 2012’, National Assessment and Accreditation Boaerd Bengaluru.
10. NBA (2019). General Manual, National Board of Accreditation, New Delhi.
11. Vijay Vir Singh, (2019). “Regulatory management and reform in India: Background paper for OECD”, CUTS International, 2019.
12. T.S. Ramakrishnan, (2014). “Financing infrastructure projects through public-private partnerships in India”, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, pp. 118–126, 2014.
13. Debbie Epstein, (1993). “Defining accountability in education”, British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 19, Issue No. 3, pp. 243 – 257, 1993.
14. Rakesh Sandhu, (2015). “Autonomy and Accountability in Higher Education”, International Journal of Research in IT, Management and Engineering, vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 15-22, 2015.
15. Sijbolt Noorda, (2013). “Academic Autonomy as a Lifelong Learning Process for Universities”, Handbook, Leadership, and Governance in Higher Education, Vol. 4, 2013.
16. B. L. Gupta, Meenakshi Gupta, (2013). “Academic Excellence in Technical Institutions”, Issues and Ideas in Education, Vol. 1, pp. 23-42, 2013.
17. Francisco Michavila, Jorge M. Martinez, (2018). “Excellence of Universities versus Autonomy, Funding and Accountability”, European Review, vol. 26, Issue S1, pp. 48–56, 2018.
18. Andrea Frankowski, Martijn van der Steen, Daphne Bressers, Martin Schulz, Claire Shewbridge, Marc Fuster, Rien Rouw, (2018). “Dilemmas of central governance and distributed autonomy in education”, OECD Education Working Papers No. 189, 2018.
19. Surya Kumar Namdeo, Sushil Dev Rout, (2016). “Calculating and interpreting Cronbach’s alpha using Rosenberg assessment scale on pediatrician’s attitude and perception on self-esteem”, International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, Vol. 3, Issue 6, pp. 1371-1374, 2016.
20. Wan Nor Arifin, (2018). “Calculating the Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for measurement scales with “not applicable” option”, Unit of Biostatistics and Research Methodology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, pp. 1-8, 2018.
21. Lani M. Van Dusen, Blaine R. Worthen, (1992). “Factors that Facilitate or Impede Implementation of Integrated Learning Systems”, Educational Technology, Vol. 32, Issue 9, pp. 16-21, 1992.
22. Mohammed Amin Almaiah, Ahmad Al-Khasawneh, Ahmad Althunibat, (2020). “Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic”, Educ Inf Technol, Vol. 22, pp. 1–20, 2020.
23. Richard Kodi, K.M. Sharath Kumar, (2020). “Assessment of key determinants in academic quality and their inter-dependencies between private and public HEIs in Ghana”, Asian Journal of Management, Vol. 11, Issue 4, pp. 457-467, 2020.
24. Nishu Ayedee, Anuj Kumar, (2020). “Indian Education System and growing number of online Conferences: Scenario under COVID-19”, Asian Journal of Management, Vol 11, Issue 4, pp. 395-401, 2020.
25. Shyamasundar Tripathy, Sanjay Kumar Satapathy, (2020). “Efficacy of Mentoring on Post Graduate Management Student Performance: A Study”, Asian Journal of Management, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 254-258, 2020.
26. Sini V Pillai, Linda Susan Mathew, Abilash Daniel, Abhilash VS., (2020). “Technology enabled online learning in a Digital age”, Asian Journal of Management, Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 266-274, 2020.
27. Swapan Banerjee, Bhaswati Samaddar, (2020). “Importance of International Accreditation for Institutions and the Role of Private Certification Bodies. Asian Journal of Management” Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp. 279-284, 2020.
28. Debodip Chowdhury. (2019). “Role of E-Learning on Education: A Review of Literature”, Asian Journal of Management, Vol. 10, Issue 3, pp. 273-278, 2019.
29. B. Janakiraman, (2018). “Life Skill Education for post Graduate Management Students: Relevance and Importance”, Asian Journal of Management, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 1005-1014, 2018.
30. Vishal Khasgiwala, Swati Oza, (2018). “Influence of Faculty Communication on Students’ Learning”, Asian Journal of Management, Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 246-250, 2018.
31. V. Subramanian, A. Ananda Kumar (2018). “Skill Enhancement Influenced by Effective Training”, Asian Journal of Management, Vol. 8, Issue 3, pp. 834-840, 2017.
32. Priyanka Ostwal, (2017). “Major Challenges of Ethical Leadership”, Asian Journal of Management, Vol, 8, Issue 2, pp. 181-186, 2017.