Lawrence Kwaku Armah, Stephen Kwame Armah
email@example.com , firstname.lastname@example.org
Lawrence Kwaku Armah1, Stephen Kwame Armah2
1Masters student, Institute of Hotel and Tourism Management, Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India.
2Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, Asante Mampong, Ghana.
Volume - 12,
Issue - 4,
Year - 2021
This research aims to assess factors motivating university students stay in private hostels. A simple random sampling technique was adopted with a sample size of 100 respondents used for this study. A twelve motivating factor variables consisting of parental influence, peer influence, university housing policy, proximity to campus, internet connectivity, security, water and power supply, cleanliness, comfortability, privacy, serenity and adequate space were however, used. The results indicate that privacy, comfortability, proximity, cleanliness and university housing policy are the most leading motivating factors. Whereas peers and internet connectivity have less influence on students stay in private hostels, gender was seen as a significant motivating factor influencing students stay in private hostels. The study recommends that students must consider security as a top priority, as it is significant for their welfare and safety.
Cite this article:
Lawrence Kwaku Armah, Stephen Kwame Armah. Assessing factors Motivating University Students’ stay in private hostels. The case of Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development (AAMUSTED), Asante Mampong Campus. Asian Journal of Management. 2021;12(4):491-5. doi: 10.52711/2321-5763.2021.00077
Lawrence Kwaku Armah, Stephen Kwame Armah. Assessing factors Motivating University Students’ stay in private hostels. The case of Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development (AAMUSTED), Asante Mampong Campus. Asian Journal of Management. 2021;12(4):491-5. doi: 10.52711/2321-5763.2021.00077 Available on: https://ajmjournal.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2021-12-4-25
1. Ackermann, A., and Visser, G. (2016). Studentification in Bloemfontein, South Africa. Bulletin of Geography Socio‐economic Series, 31, 7-17.
2. Aluko, O. (2012). The effect of land use act on sustainable housing provision in Nigeria: The Lagos State experience. Journal of Sustainable Development, 5(1), 114-122.
3. Amole, D. (2005). Coping strategies for living in student residential facilities in Nigeria. Environment and Behaviour, 37, 201‐219.
4. Ariffin, A. A. M., Maghzi, A., and Aziz, N. A. (2011). Understanding hotel hospitality and differences between local and foreign guests. International Review of Business Research Papers, 7(1), 340– 349.
5. Dahlan, N., Jones, P., Alexander, D., Salleh, E., and Alias, J. (2009). Evidence base prioritisation of indoor comfort perceptions in Malaysian typical multi‐storey hostels. Building and Environment, 44(10), 2158‐2165
6. Donaldson, R., Campbell, M., Benn, J. and de Jager, A. (2014). Reshaping urban space through studentification in two South African urban centres. Urbani izziv, 25, 176-188.
7. Garg, M., Gupta, K., and Jha, R. (2014). An empirical study on market research of organized students’ housing industry in India. International Journal of ICT and Management, 2(2), 143-154
8. Ghani, Z. A., and Suleiman, N. (2016). Theoretical Underpinning for Understanding Student Housing. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 6(1), 163-176.
9. Jabareen, Y. (2005) Culture and housing preferences in a developing city. Environment and Behavior, 37(1), 134-146.
10. Kaya, N., and Erkip, F. (2001), Satisfaction in a dormitory building: the effects of floor height on the perception of room size and crowding. Environment and Behavior, 33(1), 35‐53.
11. Khozaei, F., Hassan, A. S., and Razak, N. A. (2011). Development and validation of the Student Accommodation Preferences Instrument (SAPI). Journal of Building Appraisal, 6(3), 299-313.
12. Khozaei, F., Hassan, A.S., and Khozaei, Z. (2010a). Undergraduate students' satisfaction with hostel and sense of attachment to place: case study of university sains Malaysia. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(3), 516‐20.
13. Kobue, T., Oke, A., and Aigbavboa, C. (2017). Understanding the determinants of students’ choice of occupancy for creative construction. Procedia Engineering, 19(6), 423–428.
14. Leung, M., and Fung, I. (2005). Enhancement of classroom facilities of primary schools and its impact on learning behaviors of students. Facilities, 23(13), 585–594.
15. Lutalo, A. (2019). Factors influencing students’ choice of hostel accommodation. A case study of Makerere University. [Bachelor dissertation, Makerere University]. Institutional Repository at Makerere University. https://repository.maseno.ac.ke/bitstream/ handle/123456789/1433/THESIS.ORECH%20EMMY%20HENDRAIN-PG.MED.00137.2011-DECEMBER%202019.pdf?sequence=1andisAllowed=y
16. Mohit, M. A., Ibrahim, M., and Razita, Y. (2010). Assessment of residential satisfaction of newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International, 34(1), 18–27.
17. Muslim, M. H., Karim, H. A., and Abdullah, I. C. (2012a). Challenges of Off – Campus Living Environment for Non – Residential Students’ Well-Being in UiTM Shah Alam. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 875-883.
18. Olufemi, A. (2014). An Assessment of Housing Satisfaction among Pre-Degree Students of Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Civil and Environmental Research, 6(8), 169-178.
19. Oluoch, D. K., Ndunge, D. M. M., and Musuya, A. W. (2019). The influence of availability of college hostel accomodation facilities on students’ academic performance in kenya medical training colleges in western kenya region. African Journal of Education and Practice, 4(1), 58–72.
20. Oyetunji, A. K., and Abidoye, R. B. (2016). Assessment of the Factors Influencing Students’ Choice of Residence in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions. Sains Humanika, 8(2), 39–47.
21. Price, I., Matzdorf, F., Smith, L., and Agahi, H. (2003), The impact of facilities on student choice of university. Facilities, 21(10), 212‐22.
22. Sammons, G., Moreo, P., Benson, L.F., and Demicco, F. (1999). Analysis of female business travelers’ selection of lodging accommodations. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 8(1), 65-83.
23. Schenke, J. (2008), Purdue students prefer to go solo. College Planning and Management, 11(6), 62-64
24. Sohail, M. S., Rajadurai, J., and Rahman, N. A (2003). Managing quality in higher education: A Malaysian case study. Int. J. Educ. Mgt., 17, 141-146.
25. Thomsen, J. (2007). Home experiences in student housing: About institutional character and temporary homes. Journal of Youth Studies, 10(5), 577–596
26. Wang, D., and Li, S. M. (2006) Socio-economic differentials and stated housing preferences in Guangzhou, China. Habitat International, 30, 305-326.